Comparing antibody and small-molecule therapies for cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Kohzoh Imai
Akinori Takaoka
机构
[1] Sapporo Medical University,Department of Immunology
[2] South 1,undefined
[3] West 17,undefined
[4] Chuo-ku,undefined
[5] Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine,undefined
[6] University of Tokyo,undefined
[7] Hongo 7-3-1,undefined
[8] Bunkyo-ku,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Cancer | 2006年 / 6卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of specific molecular targeting has been applied to the development of innovative cancer-treatment strategies. At present, two main approaches are available for use in clinical practice: therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule agents.We focus on the ErbB receptor family, particularly epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, also known as ERBB1) as an example of a target in our comparison of mAbs and small-molecule inhibitors. Cetuximab, a mAb, and gefitinib and erlotinib, which are small-molecule inhibitors, differ markedly in their basic properties and their underlying mechanisms of action.The presence of activating mutations within the ATP-binding cleft of the EGFR kinase domain is associated with the sensitivity of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to gefitinib, but not to cetuximab. By contrast, cetuximab shows a clinical benefit for colorectal cancers that overexpress EGFR in a manner independent of EGFR mutations. In malignant glioma, the sensitivity to gefitinib is closely related to deletions within the ectodomain of EGFR. In contrast to these drug-sensitivity mutations, the appearance of the T790M mutation confers resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC.There are unique immune-effector mechanisms that are only triggered by therapeutic mAbs, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. By contrast, the effects of small-molecule agents are not directly linked to the activation of an immune response against tumour cells.In general, mild adverse effects such as dermatological complications are commonly observed with these two classes of EGFR inhibitors. Although interstitial lung diseases or diarrhoea are more commonly associated with small-molecule therapies, therapeutic murine mAbs or chimeric mAbs can cause immunogenicity, leading to the production of human anti-mouse antibodies or human antichimeric antibodies, respectively.It has been shown that mAbs such as trastuzumab and cetuximab exert synergistic anti-tumour effects in combination with chemotherapeutic agents more frequently than small-molecule inhibitors.The combination of distinct classes of EGFR inhibitors could not only increase their efficacy, but also contribute to overcoming resistance to one class of EGFR inhibitor.Further investigation into the distinct properties of these two classes of targeted agents should not only contribute to the development of new targeted agents but also provide an optimal therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment, thereby leading to the improvement of dual-targeted or multi-targeted therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 727
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accelerating CAR-T Cell Therapies with Small-Molecule Inhibitors
    Mestermann, Katrin
    Garitano-Trojaola, Andoni
    Hudecek, Michael
    BIODRUGS, 2025, 39 (01) : 33 - 51
  • [22] Small-molecule therapies for cardiac hypertrophy: moving beneath the cell surface
    McKinsey, Timothy A.
    Kass, David A.
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2007, 6 (08) : 617 - 635
  • [23] Introduction to a review series on small-molecule targeted therapies for lymphoid malignancies
    Roberts, Andrew W.
    Stevenson, Freda K.
    BLOOD, 2021, 138 (13) : 1089 - 1089
  • [24] Accelerating CAR-T Cell Therapies with Small-Molecule InhibitorsAccelerating CAR-T Cell Therapies with Small-Molecule InhibitorsK. Mestermann et al.
    Katrin Mestermann
    Andoni Garitano-Trojaola
    Michael Hudecek
    BioDrugs, 2025, 39 (1) : 33 - 51
  • [25] A PSMA-targeted bispecific antibody for prostate cancer driven by a small-molecule targeting ligand
    Lee, Sung Chang
    Ma, Jennifer S. Y.
    Kim, Min Soo
    Laborda, Eduardo
    Choi, Sei-Hyun
    Hampton, Eric N.
    Yun, Hwayoung
    Nunez, Vanessa
    Muldong, Michelle T.
    Wu, Christina N.
    Ma, Wenxue
    Kulidjian, Anna A.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Klyushnichenko, Vadim
    Woods, Ashley K.
    Joseph, Sean B.
    Petrassi, Mike
    Wisler, John
    Li, Jing
    Jamieson, Christina A. M.
    Schultz, Peter G.
    Kim, Chan Hyuk
    Young, Travis S.
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2021, 7 (33):
  • [26] Comparing quantitative prediction methods for the discovery of small-molecule chiral catalysts
    Jolene P. Reid
    Matthew S. Sigman
    Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2018, 2 : 290 - 305
  • [27] Comparing quantitative prediction methods for the discovery of small-molecule chiral catalysts
    Reid, Jolene P.
    Sigman, Matthew S.
    NATURE REVIEWS CHEMISTRY, 2018, 2 (10) : 290 - 305
  • [28] Small-molecule microarrays
    Weitzman J.B.
    Genome Biology, 3 (1)
  • [29] Small-molecule sensors
    Strack, Rita
    NATURE METHODS, 2020, 17 (01) : 29 - 29
  • [30] Small-molecule sensors
    Rita Strack
    Nature Methods, 2020, 17 : 29 - 29