How to Appraise a Prognostic Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kenneth Mak
Cheng Kiong Kum
机构
[1] National University Hospital,Department of Surgery
[2] Gleneagles Medical Centre,undefined
来源
World Journal of Surgery | 2005年 / 29卷
关键词
Diverticulitis; Adverse Prognostic Factor; Prognostic Study; Confounding Influence; Perforated Diverticulitis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prognostic studies are studies that examine selected predictive variables or risk factors and assess their influence on the outcome of a disease. They allow clinicians to understand better the natural history of a disease, guide clinical decision-making by facilitating the selection of appropriate treatment options, and allow more accurate prediction of disease outcomes. Appraising prognostic studies involves determining the internal validity of the study design and evaluating the influence of systemic errors or bias. In studies examining multiple prognostic variables, care must be taken to minimize the confounding influence each variable would have on the other parameters. Evaluating the results of appropriate statistical analysis enables conclusions to be made that may influence clinical practice. Care must be taken to ensure that the conditions under which the prognostic study were conducted resemble circumstances in the local institution so as to allow the conclusions to be applied to local practices.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 569
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Promotional literature: How do we critically appraise?
    Shetty, V. V.
    Karve, A., V
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2008, 54 (03) : 217 - 221
  • [42] Evaluating performance: How to appraise, promote, and fire.
    Cords, Sarah Statz
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2007, 132 (09) : 98 - 99
  • [43] Qualitative Research in CKD: How to Appraise and Interpret the Evidence
    Baumgart, Amanda
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Tong, Allison
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2021, 77 (04) : 538 - 541
  • [44] How to Appraise Research: Elements of Sound Applied Design
    Gutman, Sharon A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2009, 63 (02): : 123 - 125
  • [45] Meta-analyses: How to critically appraise them?
    Patel, Nirav
    Bajaj, Navkaranbir S.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (05) : 1598 - 1600
  • [46] Meta-analyses: How to critically appraise them?
    Nirav Patel
    Navkaranbir S. Bajaj
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018, 25 : 1598 - 1600
  • [47] How couples appraise and communicate about their fertility problems: a study using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis
    Mclellan, AJ
    Glover, L
    Weaver, S
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 22 (03) : 237 - 237
  • [48] How to critically appraise a systematic review: an aide for the reader and reviewer
    Frewen, John
    de Brito, Marianne
    Pathak, Anjali
    Barlow, Richard
    Williams, Hywel C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 48 (08) : 854 - 859
  • [49] A Study of Instruments to Appraise Teaching Competency
    Grim, Paul R.
    Hoyt, Cyril J.
    Mayo, Samuel T.
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1954, 33 (03): : 69 - +
  • [50] How do Consumers Search for and Appraise Information on Medicines on the Internet? A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups
    Peterson, Geraldine
    Aslani, Parisa
    Williams, Kylie A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2003, 5 (04)