Evaluation of beam modeling for small fields using a flattening filter-free beam

被引:2
|
作者
Kawahara D. [1 ,2 ]
Ozawa S. [3 ]
Nakashima T. [1 ]
Aita M. [1 ]
Tsuda S. [1 ]
Ochi Y. [1 ]
Okumura T. [1 ]
Masuda H. [1 ]
Ohno Y. [1 ]
Murakami Y. [3 ]
Nagata Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Section of Radiation Therapy, Department of Clinical Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima
[2] Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima
[3] Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Flattening filter-free (FFF) beam; Monte Carlo; Output factor; Small field;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-016-0365-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The characteristics of a flattening filter-free (FFF) beam are different from those of a beam with a flattening filter. For small-field dosimetry, the beam data needed by the radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) includes the percent depth dose (PDD), off-center ratio (OCR), and output factor (OPF) for field sizes down to 3 × 3 cm2to calculate the beam model. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of calculations for the FFF beam by the Eclipse™treatment planning system for field sizes smaller than 3 × 3 cm2(2 × 2 and 1 × 1 cm2). We used 6X and 10X FFF beams by the Varian TrueBeam™to produce. The AAA and AXB algorithms of the Eclipse were used to compare the Monte Carlo (MC) calculation and the measurements from three dosimeters, a diode detector, a PinPoint dosimeter, and EBT3 film. The PDD curves and the penumbra width in the OCR calculated by the Eclipse, measured data, and those from the MC calculations were in good agreement to within ±2.8 % and ±0.6 mm, respectively. However, the difference in the OPF values between AAA and AXB for a field size of 1 × 1 cm2was 5.3 % for the 6X FFF beam and 7.6 % for the 10X FFF beam. Therefore, we have to confirm the small field data that is included for the RTPS commission procedures. © 2016, Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling Beam Data for Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Photon Beams
    Zhu, T. C.
    Liang, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3825 - 3826
  • [22] Comparison of VMAT-SABR Treatment Plans with Flattened Filter (FF) Beam and Flattening Filter-Free (FFF) Beam for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Chung, J.
    Kim, J.
    Kang, S.
    Suh, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3381 - 3381
  • [23] On flattening filter-free portal dosimetry
    Pardo, Eduardo
    Castro Novais, Juan
    Molina Lopez, Maria Yolanda
    Ruiz Maqueda, Sheila
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (04): : 132 - 145
  • [24] Comparison of skin dose of flattening filter and flattening filter-free beam in volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan for head and neck cancer
    Lam Pham Hong
    Dung Phan Tien
    Thai Hoang Huu
    Lam Nguyen Tung
    Tu Nguyen Duong
    Van Anh Nguyen Thi
    Trang Pham Quang
    2023 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ICHST 2023, 2023,
  • [25] Exploration of flattening filter free vs flattening filter beam for Breast irradiation
    Gajperia, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1236 - S1236
  • [26] Dosimetric properties of a flattening filter-free 6-MV photon beam: A Monte Carlo study
    Mesbahi A.
    Mehnati P.
    Keshtkar A.
    Farajollahi A.
    Radiation Medicine, 2007, 25 (7): : 315 - 324
  • [27] Potential of Jaw Tracking Technique in Flattening Filter-Free Beam for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Murakami, Y.
    Matsubayashi, F.
    Magome, T.
    Takahashi, R.
    Arima, M.
    Kamima, T.
    Nakano, M.
    Sato, T.
    Yoshioka, Y.
    Oguchi, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E664 - E664
  • [28] Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams
    Barnes, Michael P.
    Greer, Peter B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (01): : 139 - 150
  • [29] Open beam dosimetric characteristics of True Beam medical linear accelerator with flattening filter (WFF) and flattening filter free (FFF) beam
    Mani, Karthick Raj
    Bhuiyan, Md Anisuzzaman
    Rahman, Md. Shakilur
    Islam, S. M. Azharur
    POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 24 (02): : 79 - 89
  • [30] Design and optimization of a beam flattening filter using the BEAM code
    Zha, Hao
    Chen, Huaibi
    Li, Quanfeng
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2010, 50 (09): : 1480 - 1483