A study evaluating the effects of throat packs during nasal surgery: a randomised controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Ali Al-lami
Kwamena Amonoo-Kuofi
Praneta Kulloo
Raj Lakhani
Navin Prakash
Nazir Bhat
机构
[1] Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust,
[2] Southampton General Hospital,undefined
[3] Barts Health NHS Trust,undefined
[4] The Royal London Hospital,undefined
[5] St. George’s University Hospitals,undefined
[6] Peterborough City Hospital,undefined
关键词
Throat packs; Nasal surgery; Post-operative nausea and vomiting; Throat pain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aims of this study were to identify differences in post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and throat pain between throat packed and non-packed patient groups in nasal surgery. This was a prospective, double blind, randomised controlled trial. A water-soaked throat pack gauze was inserted in the mouth to occlude the oropharynx was used in the throat pack group. The second group received no throat pack. A validated PONV questionnaire was completed 6 h post-operatively. Visual analogue scores (VAS) for throat pain were completed in recovery, 2, and 6 h post-operatively. 80 patients were enrolled (40 into each group based on power calculation). With regard to the primary outcome measure, mean PONV score for the throat pack group was 2.75 [median 0, standard deviation (SD 10.86)] and the mean PONV score for the non-packed group was 0.36 (median 0, SD 1.39). The difference in PONV was not statistically significant [P value 0.375, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.19 to 3.32]. With regard to throat pain VAS scores (our secondary outcome measure), in recovery, the mean throat pain VAS score for the throat packed group was 2.5 (median 1, SD 2.8) and the mean throat pain VAS score for the non-throat packed group was 1.3 (median 0, SD 2.5). Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the two groups with the throat pack group experiencing more throat pain in recovery (P value 0.018 (95% CI 1.13–2.52). At 2 and 6 h post-operatively, the mean throat pain VAS scores for the throat packed group were 2.1 and 2.3, respectively, and the mean throat pain VAS score for the non-throat packed group was 2.3 and 1.4, respectively. Statistical analysis showed non-significant difference between the two groups at 2 and 6 h post-operatively. The use of throat packs in nasal surgery does not confer PONV reduction benefit. The use of throat pack, however, is associated with a small but statistically significant more throat pain in the initial recovery period from nasal operations.
引用
收藏
页码:3109 / 3114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clarithromycin and endoscopic sinus surgery for adults with chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps: study protocol for the MACRO randomised controlled trial
    Carl Philpott
    Steffi le Conte
    David Beard
    Jonathan Cook
    William Sones
    Steve Morris
    Caroline S. Clarke
    Mike Thomas
    Paul Little
    Jane Vennik
    Valerie Lund
    Helen Blackshaw
    Anne Schilder
    Stephen Durham
    Spiros Denaxas
    James Carpenter
    James Boardman
    Claire Hopkins
    Trials, 20
  • [42] Interventions in randomised controlled trials in surgery: issues to consider during trial design
    Natalie S. Blencowe
    Julia M. Brown
    Jonathan A. Cook
    Chris Metcalfe
    Dion G. Morton
    Jon Nicholl
    Linda D. Sharples
    Shaun Treweek
    Jane M. Blazeby
    Trials, 16
  • [43] Interventions in randomised controlled trials in surgery: issues to consider during trial design
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Brown, Julia M.
    Cook, Jonathan A.
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Morton, Dion G.
    Nicholl, Jon
    Sharples, Linda D.
    Treweek, Shaun
    Blazeby, Jane M. d
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [44] A randomised controlled trial evaluating internal limiting membrane peeling forceps in macular hole surgery
    Mariantonia Ferrara
    Antonio Rivera-Real
    Roxane J. Hillier
    Maged Habib
    Mustafa R. Kadhim
    Maria T. Sandinha
    Katie Curran
    Alyson Muldrew
    David H. W. Steel
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2023, 261 : 1553 - 1562
  • [45] A randomised controlled trial evaluating internal limiting membrane peeling forceps in macular hole surgery
    Ferrara, Mariantonia
    Rivera-Real, Antonio
    Hillier, Roxane J.
    Habib, Maged
    Kadhim, Mustafa R.
    Sandinha, Maria T.
    Curran, Katie
    Muldrew, Alyson
    Steel, David H. W.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (06) : 1553 - 1562
  • [46] A preliminary randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of saline douching following endoscopic sinus surgery
    Freeman, S. R. M.
    Sivayoham, E. S. G.
    Jepson, K.
    de Carpentier, J.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2008, 33 (05) : 462 - 465
  • [47] Evaluating a digital prehabilitation tool in patients with colorectal surgery: protocol for a multisite randomised controlled trial
    Ogomori, Kelsey
    Broering, Jeanette
    Rogine, Camille
    Kin, Cindy
    Chang, George J.
    Finlayson, Emily
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [48] Effects of gastric bypass surgery in patients with hypertension: rationale and design for a randomised controlled trial (GATEWAY study)
    Schiavon, Carlos Aurelio
    Ikeoka, Dimas Tadahiro
    de Sousa, Marcio Goncalves
    Ananias Silva, Cellys Roberta
    Bersch-Ferreira, Angela Cristine
    de Oliveira, Juliana Dantas
    Noujaim, Patricia Malvina
    Cohen, Ricardo Vitor
    Amodeo, Celso
    Berwanger, Otavio
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (09):
  • [49] Nasopharyngeal versus hypopharyngeal packing during sino-nasal surgeries: Randomised controlled trial
    Alfiky, M. G.
    Margalani, O. A.
    Rajeh, A. F.
    Alghamdi, F. E.
    Abu Suliman, O. A.
    Muathen, S. H.
    Elmorsy, S. A.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 43 (05) : 1235 - 1241
  • [50] Effects of Smoking on Controlled Hypotension with Nitroglycerin during Ear-Nose-Throat Surgery
    Sinoglu, B.
    Ersoy, A.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 26 (06) : 657 - 665