Proliferation of Anti-Dumping Initiations Against China, its Economic Growth and Subsidized Industries

被引:0
|
作者
Kalibinuer Keyimu
机构
[1] Nagoya University Furo-cho,Graduate School of Economics
关键词
Economic growth; Anti-dumping measures; Protectionism; 12;
D O I
10.1007/BF03405729
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses and analyzes the proliferation of AD measures against China as protection against its exports in relation to its rapid economic development. In order to clarify and emphasize the rapid growth of China’s economy and its influence on the world economy, the paper first divides the global economy into two components; world without China and China itself by using a weighted-sum analysis approach. Then based on these two components, the proliferation of AD measures is analyzed along with the economic growth and downturns respectively. Chinese GDP growth rate has been rising rapidly despite growing AD measures against its exports, and their correlation is positive, whereas the world without China case shows a negative correlation. Based on this point, the paper focuses on the special case of China in combination with China’s government subsidy policy as its research objective. China’s top ten industries, which are chosen on the basis of frequency of AD measures against them, are examined based on their domestic output and exports. The hypothesis of a strong correlation between domestically subsidized industries and the top ten industries that faced AD measures is examined. An approach, that involves sophisticated examination of products, industries, firms and regions faced with AD measures, and government subsidies they received, will be adopted respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF ANTI-DUMPING AND ANTI-SUBSIDY POLICIES AMONG CHINA, THE US AND THE EU: THE PHOTOVOLTAIC INDUSTRY
    Wang, Hua
    Wang, Jue
    Feng, Zhongxian
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 63 (03): : 513 - 534
  • [32] ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES AGAINST RUSSIAN EXPORTERS: OPPORTUNITIES FOR REMOVING
    Savelyev, Oleg V.
    Khetagurova, Zarina Kh.
    MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2016, 60 (11): : 25 - 34
  • [33] Anti-dumping - Mexico opens case against European PS
    不详
    EUROPEAN CHEMICAL NEWS, 1998, 69 (1818): : 11 - 11
  • [34] Normative Obsolescence of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement-Topography of the Global Use and Misuse of Initiations and Measures
    Chaisse, Julien
    Chakraborty, Debashis
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2016, 6 (02) : 233 - 263
  • [35] The Trade Effects of US Anti-dumping Actions against China Post-WTO Entry
    Shen, Guobing
    Fu, Xiaolan
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2014, 37 (01): : 86 - 105
  • [36] US Anti-Dumping Practices Evolving against Market Economies
    Kim, Kyounghwa
    Roh, Jaeyoun
    WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2022, 21 (04) : 479 - 496
  • [37] Why Has China Become a Target of Anti-dumping Activities?
    李月芬
    China Economist, 2007, (01) : 48 - 59
  • [38] Anti-dumping Practices and China's Implementation of WTO Rulings
    Zhou Weihuan
    Zhang Shu
    CHINA QUARTERLY, 2017, 230 : 512 - 527
  • [39] The Role of Anti-Dumping in the US-China Trade War
    Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir
    CHINA AND WTO REVIEW, 2021, 7 (01): : 7 - 35
  • [40] Does innovation lead to anti-dumping: a case study of China
    Zhang, Suzhen
    Meng, Yuanru
    Chen, Wenzhi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,