How Much Warming are We Committed to and How Much can be Avoided?

被引:1
|
作者
Bill Hare
Malte Meinshausen
机构
[1] Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK),Department of Environmental Sciences
[2] Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich),undefined
[3] Environmental Physics,undefined
[4] National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR),undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2006年 / 75卷
关键词
Emission Scenario; Climate Policy; Climate Sensitivity; Geophysical Research Letter; Mitigation Scenario;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines different concepts of a ‘warming commitment’ which is often used in various ways to describe or imply that a certain level of warming is irrevocably committed to over time frames such as the next 50 to 100 years, or longer. We review and quantify four different concepts, namely (1) a ‘constant emission warming commitment’, (2) a ‘present forcing warming commitment’, (3) a‘zero emission (geophysical) warming commitment’ and (4) a ‘feasible scenario warming commitment’. While a ‘feasible scenario warming commitment’ is probably the most relevant one for policy making, it depends centrally on key assumptions as to the technical, economic and political feasibility of future greenhouse gas emission reductions. This issue is of direct policy relevance when one considers that the 2002 global mean temperatures were 0.8± 0.2 ∘C above the pre-industrial (1861–1890) mean and the European Union has a stated goal of limiting warming to 2 ∘C above the pre-industrial mean: What is the risk that we are committed to overshoot 2 ∘C? Using a simple climate model (MAGICC) for probabilistic computations based on the conventional IPCC uncertainty range for climate sensitivity (1.5 to 4.5 ∘C), we found that (1) a constant emission scenario is virtually certain to overshoot 2 ∘C with a central estimate of 2.0 ∘C by 2100 (4.2 ∘C by 2400). (2) For the present radiative forcing levels it seems unlikely that 2 ∘C are overshoot. (central warming estimate 1.1 ∘C by 2100 and 1.2 ∘C by 2400 with ∼10% probability of overshooting 2 ∘C). However, the risk of overshooting is increasing rapidly if radiative forcing is stabilized much above 400 ppm CO2 equivalence (1.95 W/m2) in the long-term. (3) From a geophysical point of view, if all human-induced emissions were ceased tomorrow, it seems ‘exceptionally unlikely’ that 2 ∘C will be overshoot (central estimate: 0.7 ∘C by 2100; 0.4 ∘C by 2400). (4) Assuming future emissions according to the lower end of published mitigation scenarios (350 ppm CO2eq to 450 ppm CO2eq) provides the central temperature projections are 1.5 to 2.1 ∘C by 2100 (1.5 to 2.0 ∘C by 2400) with a risk of overshooting 2 ∘C between 10 and 50% by 2100 and 1–32% in equilibrium. Furthermore, we quantify the ‘avoidable warming’ to be 0.16–0.26 ∘C for every 100 GtC of avoided CO2 emissions – based on a range of published mitigation scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 149
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vitamin D: How much do we need, and how much is too much?
    Heaney, RP
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 (07) : 553 - 555
  • [22] Whistle-blowers - How much we can learn from them depends on how much we can give up
    Alford, CF
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1999, 43 (02) : 264 - 277
  • [23] HOW MUCH SPECIALISATION IN PATHOLOGY CAN WE AFFORD
    BARROWCLIFF, DF
    JOURNAL OF THE FORENSIC SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1970, 10 (03): : 127 - +
  • [24] VISUAL MATERIALS - HOW MUCH CAN WE COMMUNICATE
    SEXTON, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, 1970, 13 (02) : 88 - 89
  • [25] Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050?
    Haberl, Helmut
    Erb, Karl-Heinz
    Krausmann, Fridolin
    Running, Steve
    Searchinger, Timothy D.
    Smith, W. Kolby
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [26] Preclinical studies: how much can we rely on?
    Rothstein, JD
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS, 2004, 5 : 22 - 25
  • [27] Flexible Profession: How Much Can We Bend?
    Gagne, Ann
    ENGLISH STUDIES IN CANADA, 2018, 44 (04): : 47 - 50
  • [28] Voter turnout: How much can we explain?
    John G. Matsusaka
    Filip Palda
    Public Choice, 1999, 98 : 431 - 446
  • [29] WHITHER AUTOMATION - HOW MUCH CAN WE AFFORD
    PARK, J
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF DYERS AND COLOURISTS, 1987, 103 (5-6): : 199 - 205
  • [30] DIFFERENCES IN COSTS - HOW MUCH CAN WE SAVE
    ALDRETE, JA
    HENDRICKS, PL
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1986, 64 (05) : 656 - 657