Effects of SJA boundary conditions on predicting the aerodynamic behavior of NACA 0015 airfoil in separated condition

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammad Moshfeghi
Nahmkeon Hur
机构
[1] Sogang University,Multi
[2] Sogang University,phenomena CFD Engineering Research Center
关键词
Active flow control; Morphing mesh technique; NACA 0015; Oscillatory inlet velocity; Synthetic jet actuators (SJA);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Synthetic jet actuators (SJAs) are popular active-flow control devices. Hence, they have been widely investigated through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and experiments. Although such simulations are faster, cheaper, and more popular than experiments, the simulation results of similar geometries often differ from one another. A reason for the differences between CFD results is the simplification of CFD models. To determine the influence level of SJA simplifications on the aerodynamics of an airfoil under a separated condition, this study compares the most complicated assumption for SJA simulation with the simplest one. A NACA 0015 airfoil is simulated at an angle of attack of 16.6° and a Reynolds number of 896000. Two different methods are applied to simulate SJA, namely, morphing mesh (MM) technique for piston movement and oscillatory inlet velocity (OIV) at the jet-exit location. Results reveal that the mean lift value of the MM case is only 3% less than that of the OIV case. However, the drag forces of MM case are approximately 15% higher than those of the OIV case. In addition, the vortex structures in the OIV case are smaller than those in the MM case. Finally, the cycle-averaged streamlines of the two models are similar near the trailing edge, but they differ in the vicinity of the SJA exit location.
引用
收藏
页码:1829 / 1836
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Some effects of domain size and boundary conditions on the accuracy of airfoil simulations
    Narges Golmirzaee
    David H. Wood
    Advances in Aerodynamics, 6
  • [42] Some effects of domain size and boundary conditions on the accuracy of airfoil simulations
    Golmirzaee, Narges
    Wood, David H.
    ADVANCES IN AERODYNAMICS, 2024, 6 (01)
  • [43] Aerodynamic effects of leading edge (LE) slats and slotted trailing edge (TE) flaps on NACA-2412 airfoil in prospect of optimization
    Arra, Aditya
    Anekar, Nitinkumar
    Nimbalkar, Shrikant
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 44 : 587 - 595
  • [44] Ice accretion and aerodynamic effects on a multi-element airfoil under SLD icing conditions
    Raja, L. Prince
    Lee, J. W.
    Myong, R. S.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 85 : 320 - 333
  • [45] AERODYNAMIC ENTRAINMENT THRESHOLD - EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOW CONDITIONS
    WILLIAMS, JJ
    BUTTERFIELD, GR
    CLARK, DG
    SEDIMENTOLOGY, 1994, 41 (02) : 309 - 328
  • [46] Predictions of separated and transitional boundary layers under low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions using an intermittency transport equation
    Suzen, YB
    Huang, PG
    Hultgren, LS
    Ashpis, DE
    JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2003, 125 (03): : 455 - 464
  • [47] Effects of Surface Roughness on Aerodynamic Performance of a High Subsonic Compressor Airfoil under Low Reynolds Number Conditions
    Wang M.-Y.
    Li Z.-L.
    Lu X.-G.
    Zhao S.-F.
    Zhang Y.-F.
    Zhu J.-Q.
    Lu, Xin-Gen (xingenlu@hotmail.com), 1600, Journal of Propulsion Technology (41): : 1510 - 1519
  • [48] Rarefied gas flow simulations of NACA 0012 airfoil and sharp 25-55-deg biconic subject to high order nonequilibrium boundary conditions in CFD
    Le, Nam T. P.
    Shoja-Sani, Ahmad
    Roohi, Ehsan
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 41 : 274 - 288
  • [49] Geometrical and boundary condition effects on restrained shrinkage behavior of UHPFRC slabs
    Doo-Yeol Yoo
    Nemkumar Banthia
    Young-Soo Yoon
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22 : 185 - 195
  • [50] Geometrical and boundary condition effects on restrained shrinkage behavior of UHPFRC slabs
    Yoo, Doo-Yeol
    Banthia, Nemkumar
    Yoon, Young-Soo
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (01) : 185 - 195