A Discussion of “Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model”

被引:0
|
作者
Bill Provencher
Rebecca Moore
机构
[1] University of Wisconsin,Department of Ag. & Applied Economics
来源
关键词
attitudinal data; heterogeneous preferences; latent class; mixed logit; random parameters; random utility model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the current issue of Environmental and Resource Economics, Morey et al. (2006) discuss a new approach to using attitudinal data in latent class modeling. We compare this approach with the one taken in Boxall and Adamowicz (2002), in the context of a discrete choice, random utility framework with heterogeneous preferences. We derive the respective likelihood functions of the two approaches to show that they are structurally similar, and discuss their implications for the use of attitudinal data. We conclude with a discussion comparing the relative merits of latent class and random parameters (mixed logit) modeling, offering the view that as a practical matter, choosing between them depends on the analyst’s judgment about the correlation of preference parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 124
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] A discussion of "Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: A latent-class model"
    Provencher, B
    Moore, R
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (01): : 117 - 124
  • [2] Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: A latent-class model
    Morey, E
    Thacher, J
    Breffle, W
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (01): : 91 - 115
  • [3] Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model
    Edward Morey
    Jennifer Thacher
    William Breffle
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2006, 34 : 91 - 115
  • [4] Using patient characteristics and attitudinal data to identify depression treatment preference groups: A latent-class model
    Thacher, JA
    Morey, E
    Craighead, WE
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2005, 21 (02) : 47 - 54
  • [5] Using attitudinal data to identify latent classes that vary in their preference for landscape preservation
    Morey, Edward
    Thiene, Mara
    De Salvo, Maria
    Signorello, Giovanni
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 68 (1-2) : 536 - 546
  • [6] Brief instrument to identify information preference groups in cancer patients: A latent-class analysis
    Neumann, M.
    Wirtz, M.
    Bollschweiler, E.
    Ernstmann, N.
    Warm, M.
    Wolf, J.
    Pfaff, H.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 17 (03) : S81 - S81
  • [7] Brief instrument to identify information preference groups in cancer patients: A latent-class analysis
    Neumann, M.
    Markus, W.
    Bollschweiler, E.
    Ernstmann, N.
    Warm, M.
    Wolf, J.
    Pfaff, H.
    ONKOLOGIE, 2008, 31 : 157 - 158
  • [8] Brief instrument to identify information preference groups in cancer patients: a latent-class analysis
    Neumann, M.
    Wirtz, M.
    Bollschweiler, E.
    Ernstmann, N.
    Warm, M.
    Wolf, J.
    Pfaff, H.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (04): : 145 - 146
  • [9] A Joint Latent-Class Model: Combining Likert-Scale Preference Statements With Choice Data to Harvest Preference Heterogeneity
    Breffle, William S.
    Morey, Edward R.
    Thacher, Jennifer A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 50 (01): : 83 - 110
  • [10] A Joint Latent-Class Model: Combining Likert-Scale Preference Statements With Choice Data to Harvest Preference Heterogeneity
    William S. Breffle
    Edward R. Morey
    Jennifer A. Thacher
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 50 : 83 - 110