A comparative study on prediction of throughput in coal ports among three models

被引:0
|
作者
Shuang Liu
Lixia Tian
Yuansheng Huang
机构
[1] North China Electric Power University,College of Economics and Management
[2] College of Quality and Technology Supervision,undefined
[3] Hebei University,undefined
关键词
Least squares support vector machines; Adaptive particle swarm optimization; Coal port throughput;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Three forecasting models, i.e., the least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), the neural network with back-propagation algorithm (BP), and a hybrid approach called APSO-LSSVM, are presented in this paper to predict the throughput of coal ports. A comparative study on the prediction accuracy among the three models is conducted. The purpose of this comparative study is to provide some useful guidelines for selecting a more accurate model to predict the throughput. The comparative results experimentally show that, in comparison with LSSVM and BP, the APSO-LSSVM has the more accurate accuracy and the better generalization performance regarding the indexes average error, mean absolute error and mean squared error.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative investigation among three cavitation models for simulating cavitating venturi
    Cao, D., 1600, Northwestern Polytechnical University (31):
  • [32] A Comparative Study of Three Predictive Tools for Forecasting a Transfer Line's Throughput
    Hillberg, Patrick A.
    Sengupta, Sankar
    Van Til, Robert P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2009, 16 (01): : 32 - 40
  • [33] A comparative study of thermochemistry models for oxy-coal combustion simulation
    Goshayeshi, Babak
    Sutherland, James C.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2015, 162 (10) : 4016 - 4024
  • [34] Combined Throughput Prediction of Fujian Coastal Ports based on Grey Model and Markov Chain
    Wang, Yu
    Wang, Zhiming
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION (SSMI 2018), 2018, 68 : 97 - 104
  • [35] Bayesian Network Models for Web Effort Prediction: A Comparative Study
    Mendes, Emilia
    Mosley, Nile
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2008, 34 (06) : 723 - 737
  • [36] AMS Solar Energy Prediction: A Comparative Study of Regression Models
    Araf, Imane
    Elkhadiri, Hind
    Errattahi, Rahhal
    El Hannani, Asmaa
    2019 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTING IN DATA SCIENCES (ICDS 2019), 2019,
  • [37] A comparative study of prediction and classification models on NCDC weather data
    Gad I.
    Hosahalli D.
    International Journal of Computers and Applications, 2022, 44 (05) : 414 - 425
  • [38] A Comparative Study of Two Prediction Models for Brain Tumor Progression
    Zhou, Deqi
    Loc Tran
    Wang, Jihong
    Li, Jiang
    IMAGE PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS AND SYSTEMS XIII, 2015, 9399
  • [39] Comparative Study on the Prediction of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Aircraft with Turbulence Models
    Yujin Jang
    Jinbum Huh
    Namhun Lee
    Seungsoo Lee
    Youngmin Park
    International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2018, 19 : 13 - 23
  • [40] Comparative study of various creep and shrinkage prediction models for concrete
    Goel, Rajeev
    Kumar, Ram
    Paul, D. K.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2007, 19 (03) : 249 - 260