How conservation initiatives go to scale

被引:0
|
作者
Morena Mills
Michael Bode
Michael B. Mascia
Rebecca Weeks
Stefan Gelcich
Nigel Dudley
Hugh Govan
Carla L. Archibald
Cristina Romero-de-Diego
Matthew Holden
Duan Biggs
Louise Glew
Robin Naidoo
Hugh P. Possingham
机构
[1] Imperial College London,Department of Life Sciences
[2] The University of Queensland,Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science
[3] The University of Queensland,Australian Research Council, Centre of Excellence in Environmental Decisions
[4] Queensland University of Technology,School of Mathematical Sciences
[5] Conservation International,Moore Center for Science
[6] James Cook University,Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
[7] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile,Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability and Center for the Study of Multiple Drivers on Marine Socio
[8] Equilibrium Research,Ecological Systems, Departamento de Ecologia
[9] University of Queensland,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences
[10] St Lucia,School of Government, Development and International Affairs
[11] The University of the South Pacific,Centre for Applications in Natural Resource Mathematics, School of Mathematics and Physics
[12] University of Queensland,Environmental Futures Research Institute
[13] Griffith University,Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology
[14] Stellenbosch University,Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, School of Public Leadership
[15] Stellenbosch University,Global Science
[16] World Wildlife Fund,undefined
[17] World Wildlife Fund,undefined
[18] The Nature Conservancy,undefined
来源
Nature Sustainability | 2019年 / 2卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although a major portion of the planet’s land and sea is managed to conserve biodiversity, little is known about the extent, speed and patterns of adoption of conservation initiatives. We undertook a quantitative exploration of how area-based conservation initiatives go to scale by analysing the adoption of 22 widely recognized and diverse initiatives from across the globe. We use a standardized approach to compare the potential of different initiatives to reach scale. While our study is not exhaustive, our analyses reveal consistent patterns across a variety of initiatives: adoption of most initiatives (82% of our case studies) started slowly before rapidly going to scale. Consistent with diffusion of innovation theory, most initiatives exhibit slow–fast–slow (that is, sigmoidal) dynamics driven by interactions between existing and potential adopters. However, uptake rates and saturation points vary among the initiatives and across localities. Our models suggest that the uptake of most of our case studies is limited; over half of the initiatives will be taken up by <30% of their potential adopters. We also provide a methodology for quantitatively understanding the process of scaling. Our findings inform us how initiatives scale up to widespread adoption, which will facilitate forecasts of the future level of adoption of initiatives, and benchmark their extent and speed of adoption against those of our case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 940
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条