A risk assessment method of deep excavation based on Bayesian analysis and expert elicitation

被引:19
|
作者
Wang N. [1 ,2 ]
Xu C.-S. [3 ]
Du X.-L. [4 ]
Zhang M.-J. [5 ]
机构
[1] College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Room C545, Like Building, No. 100, Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing
[2] Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control of Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang
[3] Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Room 412, Jiangong East Building, No. 100, Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing
[4] Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Room 415, Jiangong East Building, No. 100, Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing
[5] College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Room 420, Jiangong East Building, No. 100, Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing
关键词
Bayesian analysis; Deep excavation; Evaluation of construction safety risk; Expert elicitation;
D O I
10.1007/s13198-017-0689-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In project management, it is an important approach that the deep excavation safety risk (DESR) is synthetically assessed based on experiential information provided by experts. This information is usually obtained from multiple sources and is incomplete. Therefore, the problem of synthesizing multiple sources and uncertainty information is of great significance for the assessment and control of DESR. This paper presents a risk assessment and decision approach for deep excavation construction based on Bayesian analysis. First, the expressions of a likelihood function used to describe and synthesize uncertain information obtained from expert panel is constructed, and a discretization interval division method of occurrence probability and consequences of an unwanted event is proposed based on the current risk code in China. Then, the discrete model of synthesizing information of expert estimates is constructed, and a comparative analysis of expert-elicited results and formula deduction are utilized to evaluate the advantages of this model under some hypothetical scenarios. On that basis, the index system of DESR is established and the weight of each index is calculated by the method of analytic hierarchy process. The risk matrix, deviation degree and risk acceptance criteria are developed to determine the whole risk level. Finally, the proposed method is verified by analyzing a typical deep excavation of Beijing Metro. The results demonstrate the feasibility of this method and its application potential. © 2017, The Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India and The Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 466
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Expert elicitation and data noise learning for material flow analysis using Bayesian inference
    Dong, Jiayuan
    Liao, Jiankan
    Huan, Xun
    Cooper, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2023, 27 (04) : 1105 - 1122
  • [22] BaNTERA: A Bayesian Network for Third-Party Excavation Risk Assessment
    Ruiz-Tagle, Andres
    Lewis, Austin D.
    Schell, Colin A.
    Lever, Ernest
    Groth, Katrina M.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 223
  • [23] BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF EXPERT ELICITATION RESPONSES FOR LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT REPLACEMENT PROBABILITY ESTIMATES
    Cluever, Joseph
    Esselman, Thomas
    Harvey, Sam
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 7, 2017,
  • [24] A Dynamic Risk Assessment Method Based on Bayesian Attack Graph
    Luo, Zhiyong
    Xu, Rui
    Wang, Jianming
    Zhu, Weicheng
    International Journal of Network Security, 2022, 24 (05) : 787 - 796
  • [25] Engagement Evaluation for Autism Intervention by Robots Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network and Expert Elicitation
    Feng, Yongli
    Jia, Qingxuan
    Chu, Ming
    Wei, Wei
    IEEE ACCESS, 2017, 5 : 19494 - 19504
  • [26] Elicitation of expert knowledge for engineering risk analysis. Myth and reality
    Ranasinghe, Malik
    Engineer, 1991, 19 (03):
  • [27] Modeling uncertainty of expert elicitation for use in risk-based optimization
    Teter, Michael D.
    Royset, Johannes O.
    Newman, Alexandra M.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 280 (1-2) : 189 - 210
  • [28] Advanced Risk Assessment for Deep Excavation in Karst Regions Using Improved Dempster-Shafer and Dynamic Bayesian Networks
    Lei, Zhenyu
    Wang, Yanhong
    Zhang, Yu
    Gu, Feng
    Zan, Zihui
    Mei, Yuan
    Liu, Wenzhan
    Zhou, Dongbo
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (09)
  • [29] A Bayesian Assessment Method of Network Risk
    Huang Jiwen
    Deng Zhilong
    APPLIED SCIENCE, MATERIALS SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INDUSTRY, 2014, 513-517 : 1684 - 1687
  • [30] Modeling uncertainty of expert elicitation for use in risk-based optimization
    Michael D. Teter
    Johannes O. Royset
    Alexandra M. Newman
    Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 280 : 189 - 210