Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture

被引:0
|
作者
M. B. F. Jensen
K. E. P. Olsen
X. C. Nielsen
A. M. Hoegh
R. B. Dessau
T. Atlung
J. Engberg
机构
[1] Slagelse Hospital,Department of Clinical Microbiology
[2] Statens Serum Institut,Department of Microbiology and Infection Control
[3] Hvidovre Hospital,Department of Clinical Microbiology
[4] Roskilde University,Department of Science, Systems and Models
关键词
Polymerase Chain Reaction; Clostridium Difficile Infection; Toxigenic Culture; Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotypes; Genotypic Polymerase Chain Reaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) requires the detection of toxigenic C. difficile or its toxins and a clinical assessment. We evaluated the performance of four nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) detecting toxigenic C. difficile directly from faeces compared to routine toxigenic culture. In total, 300 faecal samples from Danish hospitalised patients with diarrhoea were included consecutively. Culture was performed in duplicate (routine and ‘expanded toxigenic culture’: prolonged and/or re-culture) and genotypic toxin profiling by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), PCR ribotyping and toxinotyping (TT) were performed on culture-positive samples. In parallel, the samples were analysed by four NAATs; two targeting tcdA or tcdB (illumigene® C. difficile and PCRFast® C. difficile A/B) and two multi-target real-time (RT) PCR assays also targeting cdt and tcdC alleles characteristic of epidemic and potentially more virulent PCR ribotypes 027, 066 and 078 (GeneXpert® C. difficile/Epi and an ‘in-house RT PCR’ two-step algorithm). The multi-target assays were significantly more sensitive compared to routine toxigenic culture (p < 0.05) and significantly more robust to inhibition compared to PCRFast (p < 0.001). Duplicate ‘expanded toxigenic culture’ increased the culture-positive rate by 29 % compared to routine culture. The ability of the GeneXpert and in-house assays to correctly classify PCR ribotype 027 was high (>95 %), and in-house PCR displayed 100 % correct identification of PCR ribotypes 066 and 078. Furthermore, the presence of the PCR enhancer bovine serum albumin (BSA) was found to be related to high sensitivity and low inhibition rate. Rapid laboratory diagnosis of toxigenic C. difficile by RT PCR was accurate.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 736
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in diarrheal stools by rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Goldenberg, Simon D.
    Dieringer, Thomas
    French, Gary L.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2010, 67 (03) : 304 - 307
  • [42] Real-time multiplex PCR assays for reliable detection of Clostridium perfringens toxin genes in animal isolates
    Albini, S.
    Brodard, I.
    Jaussi, A.
    Wollschlaeger, N.
    Frey, J.
    Miserez, R.
    Abril, C.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 127 (1-2) : 179 - 185
  • [43] Molecular diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis in faecal samples using real-time PCR
    Verweij, Jaco J.
    Canales, Marco
    Polman, Katja
    Ziem, Juventus
    Brienen, Eric A. T.
    Polderman, Anton M.
    van Lieshout, Lisette
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2009, 103 (04) : 342 - 346
  • [44] Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. An evaluation of tests for faecal toxin, glutamate dehydrogenase, lactoferrin and toxigenic culture in the diagnostic laboratory
    Wren, M. W. D.
    Sivapalan, M.
    Kinson, R.
    Shetty, N. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 66 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [45] Real-time cellular analysis for quantitative detection of functional Clostridium difficile toxin in stool
    Huang, Bin
    Li, Haijing
    Jin, Dazhi
    Stratton, Charles W.
    Tang, Yi-Wei
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2014, 14 (03) : 281 - 291
  • [46] RAPID DETECTION OF TOXIGENIC CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE IN FECAL SAMPLES BY MAGNETIC IMMUNE PCR ASSAY
    WOLFHAGEN, MJHM
    FLUIT, AC
    TORENSMA, R
    POPPELIER, MJJG
    VERHOEF, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (07) : 1629 - 1633
  • [47] Comparison of real-time PCR and direct culture for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from human faecal samples
    Eastwood, K.
    Schuster, H.
    Gascoyne-Binzi, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S138 - S138
  • [48] Comparison of Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH), Toxin, and Real-Time PCR for Clostridium difficile Screening: Algorithm for Testing
    Johnson, Gina E.
    Zhang, Yibo
    Page-Taylor, Rosalind
    Wu, Yi-Chi
    Drake, Tim
    Wang, Yun F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 140 (03) : 434 - 435
  • [49] Comparison of Real-Time PCR Techniques to Cytotoxigenic Culture Methods for Diagnosing Clostridium difficile Infection
    Knetsch, C. W.
    Bakker, D.
    de Boer, R. F.
    Sanders, I.
    Hofs, S.
    Kooistra-Smid, A. M. D.
    Corver, J.
    Eastwood, K.
    Wilcox, M. H.
    Kuijper, E. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (01) : 227 - 231
  • [50] Evaluation of 3 automated real-time PCR (Xpert C. difficile assay, BD MAX Cdiff, and IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000 assay) for detecting Clostridium difficile toxin gene compared to toxigenic culture in stool specimens
    Yoo, Jaeeun
    Lee, Hyeyoung
    Park, Kang Gyun
    Lee, Gun Dong
    Park, Yong Gyu
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2015, 83 (01) : 7 - 10