Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture

被引:0
|
作者
M. B. F. Jensen
K. E. P. Olsen
X. C. Nielsen
A. M. Hoegh
R. B. Dessau
T. Atlung
J. Engberg
机构
[1] Slagelse Hospital,Department of Clinical Microbiology
[2] Statens Serum Institut,Department of Microbiology and Infection Control
[3] Hvidovre Hospital,Department of Clinical Microbiology
[4] Roskilde University,Department of Science, Systems and Models
关键词
Polymerase Chain Reaction; Clostridium Difficile Infection; Toxigenic Culture; Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotypes; Genotypic Polymerase Chain Reaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) requires the detection of toxigenic C. difficile or its toxins and a clinical assessment. We evaluated the performance of four nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) detecting toxigenic C. difficile directly from faeces compared to routine toxigenic culture. In total, 300 faecal samples from Danish hospitalised patients with diarrhoea were included consecutively. Culture was performed in duplicate (routine and ‘expanded toxigenic culture’: prolonged and/or re-culture) and genotypic toxin profiling by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), PCR ribotyping and toxinotyping (TT) were performed on culture-positive samples. In parallel, the samples were analysed by four NAATs; two targeting tcdA or tcdB (illumigene® C. difficile and PCRFast® C. difficile A/B) and two multi-target real-time (RT) PCR assays also targeting cdt and tcdC alleles characteristic of epidemic and potentially more virulent PCR ribotypes 027, 066 and 078 (GeneXpert® C. difficile/Epi and an ‘in-house RT PCR’ two-step algorithm). The multi-target assays were significantly more sensitive compared to routine toxigenic culture (p < 0.05) and significantly more robust to inhibition compared to PCRFast (p < 0.001). Duplicate ‘expanded toxigenic culture’ increased the culture-positive rate by 29 % compared to routine culture. The ability of the GeneXpert and in-house assays to correctly classify PCR ribotype 027 was high (>95 %), and in-house PCR displayed 100 % correct identification of PCR ribotypes 066 and 078. Furthermore, the presence of the PCR enhancer bovine serum albumin (BSA) was found to be related to high sensitivity and low inhibition rate. Rapid laboratory diagnosis of toxigenic C. difficile by RT PCR was accurate.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 736
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture
    Jensen, M. B. F.
    Olsen, K. E. P.
    Nielsen, X. C.
    Hoegh, A. M.
    Dessau, R. B.
    Atlung, T.
    Engberg, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 34 (04) : 727 - 736
  • [2] Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A/B genes by multiplex real-time PCR for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection
    Kim, Heejung
    Jeong, Seok Hoon
    Kim, Myungsook
    Lee, Yangsoon
    Lee, Kyungwon
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 61 (02) : 274 - 277
  • [3] Rapid diagnosis of toxinogenic Clostridium difficile in faecal samples with internally controlled real-time PCR
    van den Berg, RJ
    Kuijper, EJ
    van Coppenraet, LESB
    Claas, ECJ
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2006, 12 (02) : 184 - 186
  • [4] Evaluation of Real-Time PCR for Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxin
    Essmyer, C.
    Hammel, J.
    Singh, D.
    Rachel, J.
    Campbell, D.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2009, 11 (06): : 637 - 637
  • [5] Comparison of real-time PCR, "in house" PCR, enzyme immunoassay and toxigenic culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
    Azula, N.
    Ruggeri, D.
    Zarate, M.
    Relloso, M. S.
    Romano, V.
    Videla, C.
    Bonvehi, P.
    Castelli, E.
    Farace, M. I.
    Smayevsky, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 73 : 152 - 152
  • [6] Real-time PCR detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in a children's hospital
    Luna, R.
    Webb, C.
    Boyanton, B. L.
    Jones, S. C.
    Ton, T. T.
    Menne, K. G.
    Courtney, E. M.
    Versalovic, J.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2007, 9 (05): : 681 - 681
  • [7] Comparison of a Commercial Real-Time PCR Assay for tcdB Detection to a Cell Culture Cytotoxicity Assay and Toxigenic Culture for Direct Detection of Toxin-Producing Clostridium difficile in Clinical Samples
    Stamper, Paul D.
    Alcabasa, Romina
    Aird, Deborah
    Babiker, Wisal
    Wehrlin, Jennifer
    Ikpeama, Ijeoma
    Carroll, Karen C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (02) : 373 - 378
  • [8] A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
    Martina Neuendorf
    Raquel Guadarrama-Gonzalez
    Birgit Lamik
    Colin R. MacKenzie
    BMC Microbiology, 16
  • [9] A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
    Neuendorf, Martina
    Guadarrama-Gonzalez, Raquel
    Lamik, Birgit
    MacKenzie, Colin R.
    BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [10] Real-time PCR of toxin genes in stool samples is rapid and accurate in diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection
    Song, Pil Hun
    Kim, You Sun
    Lee, Jeonghun
    Sung, Hyun
    Min, Jung Hwa
    Ryu, Soo Hyung
    Yoon, Won Jae
    Moon, Jeong Seop
    Whang, Dong Hee
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 114 - 115