Evolution of robotic surgery in the treatment of localized prostate cancer

被引:11
|
作者
Zorn K.C. [1 ]
Gofrit O.N. [1 ]
Steinberg G.D. [1 ]
Shalhav A.L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Radical Prostatectomy; Robotic Surgery; Localize Prostate Cancer; Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1007/s11864-007-0028-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is the second most common cancer in men in the United States (following only skin cancer) and accounts for 33% of all newly diagnosed male cancers. It is estimated that in 2007, 218,890 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer and 27,050 will die from this disease. While most currently diagnosed prostate cancers are localized, radical prostatectomy remains a gold standard treatment. Since its original description, radical retropubic prostatectomy has evolved over the last three decades to a precise, sophisticated procedure with minimal mortality, and excellent surgical outcomes. However, despite its efficacy, open surgical treatment is inherently associated with blood loss and significant pain. Due to these reasons, many men have sought other, less invasive forms of treatment. With its development in the late 1990s, minimally invasive surgery has significantly and irrevocably changed the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. Robotic-assisted technology has further propelled the utilization of the laparoscopic approach for radical prostatectomy, particularly for non-laparoscopic trained surgeons. The implementation of robotic technology has been rapid. Presently, 7 years after its approval by the FDA, many hospitals have established for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy programs. This trend will undoubtedly continue to grow as more surgeons become familiar with the procedure, more robotic systems become available, and increasingly mature data is published. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy allows patients the benefits of minimally invasive surgery with functional and oncological results comparable to those from open and standard laparoscopic procedures, we believe that this surgical approach will shortly evolve into the standard surgical approach for localized prostate cancer. © Current Science Inc. 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 210
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prostate Cancer: Diagnosis, Imaging, and Robotic Surgery
    Yip, S. K. H.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 16 (04): : S66 - S68
  • [22] Validation of increasing prostate specific antigen as a predictor of prostate cancer death after treatment of localized prostate cancer with surgery or radiation
    Albertsen, PC
    Hanley, JA
    Penson, DF
    Fine, J
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (06): : 2221 - 2225
  • [23] THE COST OF TREATMENT FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Garbens, Alaina
    Wallis, Christopher
    Saskin, Refik
    Nam, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E42 - E43
  • [24] TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR LOCALIZED CANCER OF THE PROSTATE
    ENGELSTEIN, D
    SERVADIO, C
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 31 (2-3): : 133 - 136
  • [25] Localized Prostate Cancer: Treatment Options
    Brawley, Stephen
    Mohan, Ravinder
    Nein, Christopher D.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2018, 97 (12) : 798 - 805
  • [26] Treatment Improves for Localized Prostate Cancer
    不详
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (22) : 3929 - 3929
  • [27] Surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Damber, JE
    Khatami, A
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2005, 44 (06) : 599 - 604
  • [28] Robotic Surgery Review of Prostate and Bladder Cancer
    Sohn, William
    Lee, Hak J.
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (02): : 133 - 139
  • [29] Complications of treatment for localized prostate cancer
    Fowler, JE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (04): : 1386 - 1386
  • [30] Treatment options for localized prostate cancer
    Keyes, Mira
    Crook, Juanita
    Morton, Gerard
    Vigneault, Eric
    Usmani, Nawaid
    Morris, W. James
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2013, 59 (12) : 1269 - 1274