A Review of NICE Methods and Processes Across Health Technology Assessment Programmes: Why the Differences and What is the Impact?

被引：0
|
作者：
Emma Cowles
Grace Marsden
Amanda Cole
Nancy Devlin
机构：
[1] Office of Health Economics,
来源：
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | 2017年 / 15卷
关键词：
National Health Service; Health Technology Assessment; Budget Impact; Health Technology Assessment Programme; Health Technology Assessment Process;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：469 / 477
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differences in the impact of precarious employment on health across population subgroups: a scoping review
    Gray, B. J.
    Grey, C. N. B.
    Hookway, A.
    Homolova, L.
    Davies, A. R.
    PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 141 (01) : 37 - 49
  • [22] WHY DOESN'T ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PLAY A BIGGER ROLE IN HEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT - A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Russell, R.
    Maerkedahl, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S348 - S348
  • [23] Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review
    Baghbanian, Abdolvahab
    Merlin, Tracy
    Carter, Drew
    Wang, Shuhong
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [24] A HTA of what? Reframing through including patient perspectives in health technology assessment processes
    Gunn, Callum J. J.
    Regeer, Barbara J. J.
    Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [25] Correction to: Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance‑Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation
    Alison Peel
    Michelle Jenks
    Moni Choudhury
    Rosemary Lovett
    Juan Carlos Rejon‑Parrilla
    Andrew Sims
    Joyce Craig
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2019, 17 : 263 - 264
  • [26] Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance-Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation
    Alison Peel
    Michelle Jenks
    Moni Choudhury
    Rosemary Lovett
    Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla
    Andrew Sims
    Joyce Craig
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2018, 16 : 819 - 836
  • [27] Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance-Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation
    Peel, Alison
    Jenks, Michelle
    Choudhury, Moni
    Lovett, Rosemary
    Rejon-Parrilla, Juan Carlos
    Sims, Andrew
    Craig, Joyce
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 16 (06) : 819 - 836
  • [28] COMPARISON OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS: A REVIEW OF THEIR IMPACT ON EXPENDITURE AND OUTCOMES
    Balkhi, B.
    Alshehri, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S373 - S373
  • [29] META-ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY SUBMISSIONS TO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AUTHORITIES: CRITICISMS BY NICE AND EVIDENCE REVIEW GROUPS IN THE UK
    Batson, S.
    Webb, N.
    Greenall, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A720 - A720
  • [30] What Is Next for Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment? A Systematic Review of the Challenges
    Huls, Samare P. I.
    Whichello, Chiara L.
    van Exel, Job
    Uyl-de Groot, Carin A.
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (11) : 1318 - 1328
12345