Privacy protection vs. utility in visual dataAn objective evaluation framework

被引:0
|
作者
Ádám Erdélyi
Thomas Winkler
Bernhard Rinner
机构
[1] Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt and Lakeside Labs,Institute of Networked and Embedded Systems
[2] ams AG,undefined
来源
关键词
Visual privacy; Video surveillance; Privacy evaluation framework; Privacy/utility trade-off;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ubiquitous and networked sensors impose a huge challenge for privacy protection which has become an emerging problem of modern society. Protecting the privacy of visual data is particularly important due to the omnipresence of cameras, and various protection mechanisms for captured images and videos have been proposed. This paper introduces an objective evaluation framework in order to assess such protection methods. Visual privacy protection is typically realised by obfuscating sensitive image regions which often results in some loss of utility. Our evaluation framework assesses the achieved privacy protection and utility by comparing the performance of standard computer vision tasks, such as object recognition, detection and tracking on protected and unprotected visual data. The proposed framework extends the traditional frame-by-frame evaluation approach by introducing two new approaches based on aggregated and fused frames. We demonstrate our framework on eight differently protected video-sets and measure the trade-off between the improved privacy protection due to obfuscating captured image data and the degraded utility of the visual data. Results provided by our objective evaluation method are compared with an available state-of-the-art subjective study of these eight protection techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:2285 / 2312
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation Framework for Personal Health Records: Microsoft HealthVault vs. Google Health
    Sunyaev, Ali
    Chornyi, Dmitry
    Mauro, Christian
    Kremar, Helmut
    43RD HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCES VOLS 1-5 (HICSS 2010), 2010, : 2403 - 2412
  • [32] STATIC VS DYNAMIC VISUAL-FIELD EVALUATION - WITH EMPHASIS ON THE UTILITY OF THE FRIEDMANN VISUAL-FIELD ANALYZER
    YELLEN, M
    SHERMAN, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 1979, 50 (01) : 95 - 99
  • [33] Cost-utility evaluation of adjuvant hormonal options in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: tamoxifen vs. anastrazole vs. tamoxifen then exemestane.
    Skedgel, C
    Rayson, D
    Dewar, R
    Younis, T
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 94 : S217 - S218
  • [34] RTEF-PP: A Robust Trust Evaluation Framework with Privacy Protection for Cloud Services Providers
    Zhong, Hong
    Zou, JianZhong
    Cui, Jie
    Xu, Yan
    ALGORITHMS AND ARCHITECTURES FOR PARALLEL PROCESSING (ICA3PP 2019), PT I, 2020, 11944 : 330 - 344
  • [35] Patients' readiness for deinstitutionalization: objective evaluation vs. subjective views of staff, relatives and patients themselves
    George Giaglis
    Barbara Michailidou
    Georgios Angelidis
    Annals of General Psychiatry, 5 (Suppl 1)
  • [36] EVALUATION OF USER REACTION TO VISUAL TELECONFERENCING OVER SATELLITE VS. TERRESTRIAL FACILITIES.
    Levetin, Martin S.
    Rafsky, Lawrence C.
    1978, v (3 5):
  • [37] Visual soil evaluation - Spade vs. profile methods and the information conveyed for soil management
    Emmet-Booth, J. P.
    Forristal, P. D.
    Fenton, O.
    Bondi, G.
    Holden, N. M.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2019, 187 : 135 - 143
  • [38] A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Two Visual Acuity Testing Systems: ETDRS vs. FrACT
    Tsai, Linda
    Thomas, Eugenia
    Tarrant, Janice
    Bentow, Stan
    Kasthurirangan, Sanjeev
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [39] Evaluation of Viewing Distance Vs. TV Size on Visual Fatigue in a Home Viewing Environment
    Sakamoto, Kiyomi
    Aoyama, Shoichi
    Asahara, Shigeo
    Yamashita, Kuniko
    Okada, Akira
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2009, : 19 - +
  • [40] Correlation statistical modeling between visual privacy-protection evaluation and human-pose recognition
    Liu, Jixin
    Jin, Min
    Sun, Ning
    Han, Guang
    Kwong, Sam
    MEASUREMENT, 2021, 184