Real options game models of R&D competition between asymmetric firms with spillovers

被引:5
|
作者
Leung C.M. [1 ]
Kwok Y.K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong
[2] Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
关键词
Preemptive equilibrium; R&D spillovers; Real options games; Technological and market uncertainties;
D O I
10.1007/s10203-016-0176-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using real options game models, we consider the characterization of strategic equilibria associated with an asymmetric Research and Development (R&D) race between an incumbent firm and an entrant firm in the development of a new innovative product under market and technological uncertainties. The random arrival time of the discovery of the patent protected innovative product is modeled as a Poisson process. Input spillovers on the R&D effort are modeled by the change in the leader’s hazard rate of success of innovation upon the follower’s entry into the R&D race. Asymmetry between the two competing firms include sunk costs of investment, stochastic revenue flow rates generated from the product, and hazard rates of arrival of success of R&D efforts of the two firms. Under asymmetric duopoly, we obtain the complete characterization of the three types of Markov perfect equilibria (sequential leader–follower, preemption and simultaneous entry) of the firms’ optimal R&D entry decisions with respect to various sets of model parameters. Our model shows that under positive input spillover, preemptive equilibrium does not occur in the R&D race due to the presence of dominant second mover advantage. The two firms choose optimally to enter simultaneously if the sunk cost asymmetry is relatively small; otherwise, sequential equilibrium would occur. When the initial hazard rate is low relative to the level of input spillover, simultaneous entry would occur as an optimal decision, signifying another scenario of dominant second mover advantage. On the other hand, when the initial hazard rate is sufficiently high so that the first mover advantage becomes more significant, simultaneous equilibrium does not occur even under high level of positive input spillover. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Italia.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 291
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Entry solicitation and deterrence in R&D competition with spillovers
    Rossell, M
    Walker, C
    JAPANESE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 50 (01) : 96 - 103
  • [22] Dynamic R&D with spillovers: Competition vs cooperation
    Cellini, Roberto
    Lambertini, Luca
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2009, 33 (03): : 568 - 582
  • [23] R&D and foreign direct investment with asymmetric spillovers
    Petit, Maria Luisa
    Sanna-Randaccio, Francesca
    Sestini, Roberta
    ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 21 (02) : 125 - 150
  • [24] A real options framework for R&D planning in technology-based firms
    Wang, Juite
    Wang, C. -Y.
    Wu, Cheng-Yo
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 : 93 - 114
  • [25] Competition, R&D and innovation in Chilean firms
    Montegu, Jose Pablo
    Calvo, Carolina
    Pertuze, Julio A.
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH-THE JOURNAL OF THE IBEROAMERICAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 17 (04) : 379 - 403
  • [26] Introduction to real R&D options
    Paxson, DA
    R & D MANAGEMENT, 2001, 31 (02) : 109 - 113
  • [27] Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy
    Audretsch, DB
    Vivarelli, M
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1996, 8 (03) : 249 - 258
  • [28] Channels of R&D spillovers: An empirical investigation of Swiss firms
    Harabi, N
    TECHNOVATION, 1997, 17 (11-12) : 627 - 635
  • [29] Real option games with R&D and learning spillovers
    Martzoukos, Spiros H.
    Zacharias, Eleftherios
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 41 (02): : 236 - 249
  • [30] Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms
    McGrath, RG
    Nerkar, A
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (01) : 1 - 21