Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids

被引:0
|
作者
Monica Parry
Ann Kristin Bjørnnes
Karine Toupin-April
Adhiyat Najam
David Wells
Aditi Sivakumar
Dawn P. Richards
Tina Ceroni
Marianne Park
Anne K. Ellis
Ian Gilron
Susan Marlin
机构
[1] University of Toronto,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing
[2] Oslo Metropolitan University,Department of Nursing and Health Promotion
[3] University of Ottawa,School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences
[4] University of Ottawa,Faculty of Medicine
[5] Patient Partner,Department of Medicine
[6] Diabetes Action Canada,Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Biomedical and Molecular Sciences and School of Policy Studies
[7] Clinical Trials Ontario,undefined
[8] Patient Partner,undefined
[9] Clinical Trials Ontario,undefined
[10] Patient Partner,undefined
[11] Network of Women with Disabilities,undefined
[12] Queen’s University,undefined
[13] Queen’s University,undefined
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this project was to improve sex/gender knowledge and help patients and investigators work together as partners in clinical trials. There were three phases to this project: Phase 1, search the literature to see what others had done; Phase 2, share the results of Phase 1 with key stakeholders to determine gaps, and develop tools to fill the gaps; and Phase 3, share the tools developed in Phase 2 with others to get feedback. We worked with Clinical Trials Ontario and other key stakeholders to make two decision aids—one for patients and one for investigators. The decision aids share sex/gender knowledge and information about patient-oriented research. Each decision aid has five parts: (1) Introduction (get the facts); (2) My Priorities (patient partner and investigator priorities); (3) Learn More (information on sex/gender and other resources to help patients and investigators work together); (4) My Readiness (comparing priorities with benefits and risks); and (5) My Decision (decision and next steps). Patients, investigators, and other key stakeholders really liked the decision aids and found them easy to move through, they had useful information, and they looked good. Comments included “I enjoyed that the decision aids were separated for patients and investigators”; “I liked it, it was user-friendly and easy to navigate”; and “there could be more interaction and aimed more for mobile devices”. These decision aids are the first to provide knowledge and support beyond the standard decision aids used for health decisions. Next steps include getting more feedback and using the decision aids in a laboratory and then in a real-life setting and see if people still like them.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 756
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pragmatic patient engagement in designing pragmatic oncology clinical trials
    Davies-Teye, Bernard Bright
    Medeiros, Michelle
    Chauhan, Cynthia
    Baquet, Claudia Rose
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (28) : 3691 - 3704
  • [22] Patient Engagement Essential Partnerships to Improve Outcomes
    Drenkard, Karen
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 44 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [23] Patient Engagement in Neurological Clinical Trials Design: A Conference Summary
    Cobb, Enesha M.
    Meurer, William
    Harney, Deneil
    Silbergleit, Robert
    Lake, Bray Patrick
    Clark, Christina
    Gipson, Debbie
    Barsan, William
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2015, 8 (06): : 776 - 778
  • [24] Patient decision aids to support clinical decision making: Evaluating the decision or the outcomes of the decision
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    Irwig, Les
    Bossuyt, Patrick
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (05) : 619 - 625
  • [25] Patient research partner engagement in OMERACT: Enhancing engagement through the implementation of patient engagement in research tools
    Hofstetter, Catherine
    Grosskleg, Shawna
    Hamilton, Clayon B.
    Hoens, Alison M.
    Shea, Beverley
    Tugwell, Peter
    Beaton, Dorcas
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2024, 67
  • [26] Clinical Decision Processes and Patient Engagement in Self-Management
    Bourbeau, Jean
    DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES, 2008, 16 (05) : 327 - 333
  • [27] Problem with patient decision aids
    Zadro, Joshua R.
    Traeger, Adrian C.
    Decary, Simon
    O'Keeffe, Mary
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2021, 26 (04) : 180 - 183
  • [28] Improving Patient Engagement Through Patient Decision Support
    Liu, Lisa Grossman
    Ancker, Jessica S.
    Creber, Ruth M. Masterson
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (03) : 438 - 441
  • [29] AMPLIFYING PATIENT VOICES IN RESEARCH: PATIENT ENGAGEMENT IN CORE OUTCOME SET DEVELOPMENT FOR ASTHMA TRIALS
    Chang, H.
    Tran, A.
    Al Naber, J.
    Tambor, E.
    Moloney, R.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 125 (05) : S36 - S36
  • [30] Concepts for the Development of Anesthesia-Related Patient Decision Aids
    Urman, Richard D.
    Southerland, Warren A.
    Shapiro, Fred E.
    Joshi, Girish P.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 (05): : 1030 - 1035