Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids

被引:0
|
作者
Monica Parry
Ann Kristin Bjørnnes
Karine Toupin-April
Adhiyat Najam
David Wells
Aditi Sivakumar
Dawn P. Richards
Tina Ceroni
Marianne Park
Anne K. Ellis
Ian Gilron
Susan Marlin
机构
[1] University of Toronto,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing
[2] Oslo Metropolitan University,Department of Nursing and Health Promotion
[3] University of Ottawa,School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences
[4] University of Ottawa,Faculty of Medicine
[5] Patient Partner,Department of Medicine
[6] Diabetes Action Canada,Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Biomedical and Molecular Sciences and School of Policy Studies
[7] Clinical Trials Ontario,undefined
[8] Patient Partner,undefined
[9] Clinical Trials Ontario,undefined
[10] Patient Partner,undefined
[11] Network of Women with Disabilities,undefined
[12] Queen’s University,undefined
[13] Queen’s University,undefined
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this project was to improve sex/gender knowledge and help patients and investigators work together as partners in clinical trials. There were three phases to this project: Phase 1, search the literature to see what others had done; Phase 2, share the results of Phase 1 with key stakeholders to determine gaps, and develop tools to fill the gaps; and Phase 3, share the tools developed in Phase 2 with others to get feedback. We worked with Clinical Trials Ontario and other key stakeholders to make two decision aids—one for patients and one for investigators. The decision aids share sex/gender knowledge and information about patient-oriented research. Each decision aid has five parts: (1) Introduction (get the facts); (2) My Priorities (patient partner and investigator priorities); (3) Learn More (information on sex/gender and other resources to help patients and investigators work together); (4) My Readiness (comparing priorities with benefits and risks); and (5) My Decision (decision and next steps). Patients, investigators, and other key stakeholders really liked the decision aids and found them easy to move through, they had useful information, and they looked good. Comments included “I enjoyed that the decision aids were separated for patients and investigators”; “I liked it, it was user-friendly and easy to navigate”; and “there could be more interaction and aimed more for mobile devices”. These decision aids are the first to provide knowledge and support beyond the standard decision aids used for health decisions. Next steps include getting more feedback and using the decision aids in a laboratory and then in a real-life setting and see if people still like them.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 756
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids
    Parry, Monica
    Bjornnes, Ann Kristin
    Toupin-April, Karine
    Najam, Adhiyat
    Wells, David
    Sivakumar, Aditi
    Richards, Dawn P.
    Ceroni, Tina
    Park, Marianne
    Ellis, Anne K.
    Gilron, Ian
    Marlin, Susan
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (06): : 745 - 756
  • [2] Correction to: Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids
    Monica Parry
    Ann Kristin Bjørnnes
    Karine Toupin-April
    Adhiyat Najam
    David Wells
    Aditi Sivakumar
    Dawn P. Richards
    Tina Ceroni
    Marianne Park
    Anne K. Ellis
    Ian Gilron
    Susan Marlin
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021, 14 : 301 - 301
  • [3] Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids (vol 13, pg 745, 2020)
    Parry, Monica
    Bjornnes, Ann Kristin
    Toupin-April, Karine
    Najam, Adhiyat
    Wells, David
    Sivakumar, Aditi
    Richards, Dawn P.
    Ceroni, Tina
    Park, Marianne
    Ellis, Anne K.
    Gilron, Ian
    Marlin, Susan
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (02): : 301 - 301
  • [4] Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids
    Parry, Monica
    Ceroni, Tina
    Wells, David
    Richards, Dawn P.
    Toupin-April, Karine
    Ansari, Hafsa
    Bjornnes, Ann Kristin
    Burnside, Heather
    Cavallo, Sabrina
    Day, Andrew
    Ellis, Anne
    Feldman, Debbie
    Gilron, Ian
    Najam, Adhiyat
    Zulfiqar, Zoya
    Marlin, Susan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [5] Patient and public engagement in clinical trials
    Muto, Kaori
    Higashijima, Jin
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [6] Development and application of patient decision aids
    Bae, Jong-Myon
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH, 2015, 37
  • [7] Successful patient recruitment in investigator-led clinical trials
    Bowman, S. J.
    MacFarlane, G. J.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (07) : 1207 - 1208
  • [8] Patient and Patient Group Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Stakeholder Charter
    Michaud, Stephanie
    Needham, Judy
    Sundquist, Stephen
    Johnson, Dominique
    Hanna, Sabrina
    Hosseinzadeh, Sharareh
    Bartekian, Vatche
    Steele, Patricia
    Benchimol, Sarita
    Ross, Nathalie
    Stein, Barry D.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 1447 - 1458
  • [9] Development of a personalized, interactive patient decision aid for participation in clinical trials
    Offermann-Wulms, C.
    Roumen, C.
    Ankolekar, A.
    Coenen, J.
    Nijsten, I.
    Fijten, R.
    De Ruysscher, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S1163 - S1163
  • [10] A systematic development process for patient decision aids
    Coulter, Angela
    Stilwell, Diana
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13