A comparative study of different online model parameters identification methods for lithium-ion battery

被引:0
|
作者
ShuZhi Zhang
XiongWen Zhang
机构
[1] Xi’an Jiaotong University,MOE Key Laboratory of Thermo
来源
关键词
lithium-ion battery; Thevenin model; online model parameters identification methods; state-of-charge; comprehensive performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Precise states estimation for the lithium-ion battery is one of the fundamental tasks in the battery management system (BMS), where building an accurate battery model is the first step in model-based estimation algorithms. To date, although the comparative studies on different battery models have been performed intensively, little attention is paid to the comparison among different online parameters identification methods regarding model accuracy, robustness ability, adaptability to the different battery operating conditions and computation cost. In this paper, based on the Thevenin model, the three most widely used online parameters identification methods, including extended Kalman filter (EKF), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and recursive least square (RLS), are evaluated comprehensively under static and dynamic tests. It is worth noting that, although the built model’s terminal voltage may well follow a measured curve, these identified model parameters may significantly out of reasonable range, which means that the error between measured and predicted terminal voltage cannot be seen as a gist to determine which model is the most accurate. To evaluate model accuracy more rigorously, battery state-of-charge (SOC) is further estimated based on identified model parameters under static and dynamic tests. The SOC prediction results show that EKF and RLS algorithms are more suitable to be used for online model parameters identification under static and dynamic tests, respectively. Moreover, the random offset is added into originally measured data to verify the robustness ability of different methods, whose results indicate EKF and RLS have more satisfactory ability against imprecisely sampled data under static and dynamic tests, respectively. Considering model accuracy, robustness ability, adaptability to the different battery operating conditions and computation cost simultaneously, EKF is recommended to be adopted to establish battery model in real application among these three most widely used methods.
引用
收藏
页码:2312 / 2327
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Model Study of Lithium-Ion Battery Temperature Field
    Xu, Hong-Yu
    Zhang, Pan
    Yu, Kua-Hai
    Zhang, Xu-Hui
    MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION AND ENERGY ENGINEERING: 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION AND ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2016, : 127 - 131
  • [42] Online Parameter Estimation/Tracking for Lithium-ion Battery RC Model
    Cen, Zhaohui
    Kubiak, Pierre
    Belharouak, Ilias
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (IRSEC' 16), 2016, : 936 - 940
  • [43] A Comparative Study on Different Online State of Charge Estimation Algorithms for Lithium-Ion Batteries
    Khan, Zeeshan Ahmad
    Shrivastava, Prashant
    Amrr, Syed Muhammad
    Mekhilef, Saad
    Algethami, Abdullah A.
    Seyedmahmoudian, Mehdi
    Stojcevski, Alex
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [44] Effect of Sensors Sensitivity on Lithium-Ion Battery Modeled Parameters and State of Charge: A Comparative Study
    Ali, Muhammad Umair
    Zafar, Amad
    Nengroo, Sarvar Hussain
    Hussain, Sadam
    Kim, Hee-Je
    ELECTRONICS, 2019, 8 (06):
  • [45] Lithium-ion battery models: A comparative study and a model-based powerline communication
    Saidani F.
    Hutter F.X.
    Scurtu R.G.
    Braunwarth W.
    Burghartz J.N.
    Saidani, Fida (saidani@ims-chips.de), 1600, Copernicus GmbH, Germany (15): : 83 - 91
  • [46] Online Parameter Identification of the Lithium-Ion Battery with Refined Instrumental Variable Estimation
    Wen, An
    Meng, Jinhao
    Peng, Jichang
    Cai, Lei
    Xiao, Qian
    COMPLEXITY, 2020, 2020
  • [47] An Overview and Comparison of Online Implementable SOC Estimation Methods for Lithium-Ion Battery
    Meng, Jinhao
    Ricco, Mattia
    Luo, Guangzhao
    Swierczynski, Maciej
    Stroe, Daniel-Ioan
    Stroe, Ana-Irina
    Teodorescu, Remus
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2018, 54 (02) : 1583 - 1591
  • [48] A Comparative Study of Sorting Methods for Lithium-ion batteries
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Tiansi
    Pei, Lei
    Zhu, Chunbo
    Xu, Bingliang
    2014 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND EXPO (ITEC) ASIA-PACIFIC 2014, 2014,
  • [49] Online Parameters Identification and State of Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Battery Using Adaptive Cubature Kalman Filter
    Li, Wei
    Luo, Maji
    Tan, Yaqian
    Cui, Xiangyu
    WORLD ELECTRIC VEHICLE JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (03):
  • [50] Enhanced online model identification and state of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery with a FBCRLS based observer
    Wei, Zhongbao
    Meng, Shujuan
    Xiong, Binyu
    Ji, Dongxu
    Tseng, King Jet
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 181 : 332 - 341