Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

被引:15
|
作者
Tricco A.C. [1 ]
Cogo E. [1 ]
Holroyd-Leduc J. [1 ]
Sibley K.M. [1 ]
Feldman F. [1 ]
Kerr G. [1 ]
Majumdar S.R. [1 ]
Jaglal S. [1 ]
Straus S.E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, East Building, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Falls prevention; Systematic review; Network meta-analysis; Elderly;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-2-38
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Although numerous trials of falls prevention interventions have been completed, there is extensive variation in their intervention components and clinical context, such that the key elements of an effective falls prevention program remain unclear to patients, clinicians, and policy-makers. Our objective is to identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent falls though a systematic review and meta-analysis, including a network meta-analysis. We will search for published (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ageline) and unpublished (e.g., trial registries, dissertations) randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in all languages examining interventions to prevent falls compared to usual care or other falls prevention interventions among adults aged ≥65 years from all settings (e.g., community, acute care, long-term care, and rehabilitation). The primary outcomes are number of injurious falls and number of hospitalizations due to falls. Secondary outcomes include falls rate, number of fallers, number of emergency room visits due to falls, number of physician visits due to falls, number of fractures, costs, and number of intervention-related harms (e.g., muscle soreness related to exercise).We will calibrate our eligibility criteria amongst the team and two independent team members will screen the literature search results in duplicate. Conflicts will be resolved through team discussion. A similar process will be used for data abstraction and quality appraisal with the Cochrane risk of bias tool.Our results will be synthesized descriptively and a random effects meta-analysis will be conducted if the studies are deemed methodologically, clinically, and statistically (e.g., I2<60%) similar. If appropriate, a network meta-analysis will be conducted, which will allow the comparison of interventions that have not been compared in head-to-head RCTs, as well as the effectiveness of interventions. We will identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent falls in older people. Our results will be used to optimize falls prevention strategies, and our goal is to ultimately improve the health of seniors internationally. PROSPERO registry number: CRD42013004151.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of antenatal depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wu, Yanan
    Wang, Hanbin
    Hui, Xu
    Qian, Zetao
    Wang, Mingming
    E, Fenfen
    Xu, Meng
    Zhou, Liying
    Deng, Xinxin
    Li, Xiuxia
    Yang, Kehu
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2025, 172
  • [22] Immunotherapy efficacy and patients' age: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Duan, Jianchun
    Cui, Longgang
    Zhao, Zhengyi
    Wang, Guoqiang
    Chen, Shiqing
    Bai, Yuezong
    Cai, Shangli
    Xiong, Lei
    Zhao, Xiaochen
    Wang, Zhijie
    Wang, Jie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [23] Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
    Chang, JT
    Morton, SC
    Rubenstein, LZ
    Mojica, WA
    Maglione, M
    Suttorp, MJ
    Roth, EA
    Shekelle, PG
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441): : 680 - 683
  • [24] Racism as a determinant of health: a protocol for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Paradies Y.
    Priest N.
    Ben J.
    Truong M.
    Gupta A.
    Pieterse A.
    Kelaher M.
    Gee G.
    Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) : 85
  • [25] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of interventions for insomnia in breast cancer patients: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Li, Zhifan
    Wang, Qian
    Xu, Junxia
    Song, Qihua
    Ling, Xiaoling
    Gao, Ya
    Lei, Junqiang
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [26] Efficacy of pharmacological interventions for ADHD: protocol for an updated systematic review and dose-response network meta-analysis
    Nourredine, Mikail
    Jurek, Lucie
    Salanti, Georgia
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Subtil, Fabien
    Efthimiou, Orestis
    Hamza, Tasnim
    Cortese, Samuele
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [27] Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in patients with overactive bladder: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhou, Hong
    Chen, Wenzhen
    Yan, Yunzhu
    Wu, Boyu
    Wang, Jing
    Fu, Chengwei
    NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (01): : 402 - 407
  • [28] Interventions for migraine prophylaxis: protocol of an umbrella systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zheng, Hui
    Chen, Min
    Huang, Dequan
    Li, Juan
    Chen, Qin
    Fang, Jianqiao
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (05):
  • [29] Interventions to reduce falls in hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Morris, Meg E.
    Webster, Kate
    Jones, Cathy
    Hill, Anne-Marie
    Haines, Terry
    McPhail, Steven
    Kiegaldie, Debra
    Slade, Susan
    Jazayeri, Dana
    Heng, Hazel
    Shorr, Ronald
    Carey, Leeanne
    Barker, Anna
    Cameron, Ian
    AGE AND AGEING, 2022, 51 (05)
  • [30] Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of deprescribing in falls prevention in older people
    Seppala, Lotta J.
    Kamkar, Nellie
    Ryg, Jesper
    Masud, Tahir
    Daams, Joost
    Montero-Odasso, Manuel M.
    Hartikainen, Sirpa
    Petrovic, Mirko
    van der Velde, Nathalie
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):