Nonstationary-volatility robust panel unit root tests and the great moderation

被引:0
|
作者
Christoph Hanck
Robert Czudaj
机构
[1] University of Duisburg-Essen,Chair for Econometrics, Department of Economics
来源
关键词
Panel unit root test; Nonstationary volatility; Cross-sectional dependence; GDP stationarity; Inflation stationarity; C12; C23; E31; O40;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper argues that typical applications of panel unit root tests should take possible nonstationarity in the volatility process of the innovations of the panel time series into account. Nonstationary volatility arises, for instance, when there are structural breaks in the innovation variances. A prominent example is the reduction in GDP growth variances enjoyed by many industrialized countries, known as the ‘Great moderation.’ It also proposes a new testing approach for panel unit roots that is, unlike many existing tests, robust to such volatility processes. The panel test is based on Simes’ (Biometrika 73:751–754, 1986) classical multiple test, which combines evidence from time series unit root tests of the series in the panel. As time series tests, we employ the recent proposals of Cavaliere and Taylor (J Time Ser Anal 29:300–330, 2008b). The panel test is robust to general patterns of cross-sectional dependence and yet is straightforward to implement, only requiring valid p\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$p$$\end{document} values of time series tests, and no resampling. Simulations show other panel unit root tests to suffer from sometimes severe size distortions under nonstationary volatility and that this can be remedied using the test proposed here. We use the methods to test for unit roots in OECD panels of gross domestic products and inflation rates, yielding inference robust to the ‘Great moderation’. We find little evidence of trend stationarity and mixed evidence regarding inflation stationarity.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 187
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A ROBUST AND PRACTICAL METHOD OF UNIT ROOT TESTS
    Wu, Ka Ho
    Chen, Zhao-Guo
    Wang, Wensheng
    ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN STATISTICS, 2014, 41 (01) : 21 - 67
  • [23] The effect of recursive detrending on panel unit root tests
    Westerlund, Joakim
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2015, 185 (02) : 453 - 467
  • [24] Missing Values in Panel Data Unit Root Tests
    Karavias, Yiannis
    Tzavalis, Elias
    Zhang, Haotian
    ECONOMETRICS, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [25] Recursive mean adjustment for panel unit root tests
    Shin, DW
    Kang, S
    Oh, MS
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2004, 84 (03) : 433 - 439
  • [26] Panel unit-root tests with structural breaks
    Chen, Pengyu
    Karavias, Yiannis
    Tzavalis, Elias
    STATA JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (03): : 664 - 678
  • [27] Truncated Product Methods for Panel Unit Root Tests
    Sheng, Xuguang
    Yang, Jingyun
    OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2013, 75 (04) : 624 - 636
  • [28] Panel unit root tests and real exchange rates
    MacDonald, R
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1996, 50 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [29] Panel Seasonal Unit Root Tests: An Application to Tourism
    Salish, Nazarii
    Rodrigues, Paulo M. M.
    TOURISM ECONOMICS: IMPACT ANALYSIS, 2011, : 183 - +
  • [30] Stationary bootstrapping for semiparametric panel unit root tests
    Hwang, Eunju
    Shin, Dong Wan
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2015, 83 : 14 - 25