A Review and Empirical Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Approaches to Inference on Efficiency Levels in Stochastic Frontier Models with Panel Data

This paper appliesa large number of models to three previously-analyzed data sets,and compares the point estimates and confidence intervals fortechnical efficiency levels. Classical procedures include multiplecomparisons with the best, based on the fixed effects estimates;a univariate version, marginal comparisons with the best; bootstrappingof the fixed effects estimates; and maximum likelihood givena distributional assumption. Bayesian procedures include a Bayesianversion of the fixed effects model, and various Bayesian modelswith informative priors for efficiencies. We find that fixedeffects models generally perform poorly; there is a large payoffto distributional assumptions for efficiencies. We do not findmuch difference between Bayesian and classical procedures, inthe sense that the classical MLE based on a distributional assumptionfor efficiencies gives results that are rather similar to a Bayesiananalysis with the corresponding prior.