Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine

被引:0
|
作者
Stefano Boriani
Stefano Bandiera
Rakesh Donthineni
Luca Amendola
Michele Cappuccio
Federico De Iure
Alessandro Gasbarrini
机构
[1] Rizzoli Institute,Department of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery
[2] Ospedale Maggiore “C.A.Pizzardi”,Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
[3] Alta Bates Summit Medical Center,Spine and Orthopaedic Oncology
[4] University of Bologna,Post
[5] Rizzoli Institute,Graduate School of Orthopedics
来源
European Spine Journal | 2010年 / 19卷
关键词
Spine; Tumor; En bloc resection; Complication; Morbidity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The morbidity of surgical procedures for spine tumors can be expected to be worse than for other conditions. This is particularly true of en bloc resections, the most technically demanding procedures. A retrospective review of prospective data from a large series of en bloc resections may help to identify risk factors, and therefore to reduce the rate of complications and to improve outcome. A retrospective study of 1,035 patients affected by spine tumors—treated from 1990 to 2007 by the same team—identified 134 patients (53.0% males, age 44 ± 18 years) who had undergone en bloc resection for primary tumors (90) and bone metastases (44). All clinical, histological and radiological data were recorded from the beginning of the period in a specifically built database. The study was set up to correlate diagnosis, staging and treatment with the outcome. Oncological and functional results were recorded for all patients at periodic, diagnosis-related controls, until death or the latest follow-up examination (from 0 to 211 months, median 47 months, 25th–75th percentile 22–85 months). Forty-seven on the 134 patients (34.3%) suffered a total of 70 complications (0.86 events per 100 patient-years); 32 patients (68.1%) had one complication, while the rest had 2 or more. There were 41 major and 29 minor complications. Three patients (2.2%) died from complications. Of the 35 patients with a recurrent or contaminated tumor, 16 (45.7%) suffered at least one complication; by contrast, complications arose in 31 (31.3%) of the 99 patients who had had no previous treatment and who underwent the whole of their treatment in the same center (P = 0.125). The risk of major complications was seen to be more than twice as high in contaminated patients than in non-contaminated ones (OR = 2.52, 95%CI 1.01–6.30, P = 0.048). Factors significantly affecting the morbidity are multisegmental resections and operations including double contemporary approaches. A local recurrence was recorded in 21 cases (15.7%). The rate of deep infection was higher in patients who had previously undergone radiation therapy (RT), but the global incidence of complications was lower. Re-operations were mostly due to tumor recurrences, but also to hardware failures, wound dehiscence, hematomas and aortic dissection. En bloc resection is able to improve the prognosis of aggressive benign and low-grade malignant tumors in the spine; however, complications are not rare and possibly fatal. The rate of complication is higher in multisegmental resections and when double combined approach is performed, as it can be expected in more complex procedures. Re-operations display greater morbidity owing to dissection through scar/fibrosis from previous operations and possibly from RT. The treatment of recurrent cases and planned transgression to reduce surgical aggressiveness are associated with a higher rate of local recurrence, which can be considered the most severe complication. In terms of survival and quality of life, late results are worse in recurrent cases than in complicated cases. Careful treatment planning and, in the event of uncertainty, referral to a specialty center must be stressed.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Total en bloc spondylectomy for primary tumors of the lumbar spine
    Shimizu, Takaki
    Murakami, Hideki
    Demura, Satoru
    Kato, Satoshi
    Yoshioka, Katsuhito
    Yokogawa, Noriaki
    Kawahara, Norio
    Tomita, Katsuro
    Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (37)
  • [32] Radical en Bloc Resection for Lung Cancer Invading the Spine
    Kato, M.
    Kenji, S.
    Murakami, M.
    Hiramatsu, H.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S858 - S858
  • [33] Pancreatectomy with Concomitant/En Bloc Arterial Resection: Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality
    Tee, May C.
    Farnell, Michael B.
    Kendrick, Michael L.
    Nagorney, David M.
    Krajewski, Adam
    Groeschl, Ryan
    Croome, Kristopher P.
    Smoot, Rory
    Truty, Mark J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S1200 - S1201
  • [34] DISTANT METASTASES + VASCULAR INVASION IN PATIENTS WITH EN BLOC RESECTIONS OF HEAD + NECK CANCER
    PRADIER, R
    DELAPAVA, S
    MARCHETTA, FC
    SAKO, K
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1964, 119 (01): : 17 - &
  • [35] Midline anterior craniofacial approach for malignancy: Results of en bloc versus piecemeal resections
    Wellman, BJ
    Traynelis, VC
    McCulloch, TM
    Funk, GF
    Menezes, AH
    Hoffman, HT
    SKULL BASE SURGERY, 1999, 9 (01): : 41 - 46
  • [36] Should laterally spreading tumors granular type be resected en bloc in endoscopic resections?
    Kenichiro Imai
    Kinichi Hotta
    Yuichiro Yamaguchi
    Masaki Tanaka
    Naomi Kakushima
    Kohei Takizawa
    Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
    Noboru Kawata
    Kimihiro Igarashi
    Shinya Sugimoto
    Masao Yoshida
    Takuma Oishi
    Keita Mori
    Hiroyuki Ono
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 2167 - 2173
  • [37] MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND O-ARM ASSISTED EN BLOC SPINAL TUMOR RESECTIONS
    Szabo, Viktor
    Lakosi, Ferenc
    Nagy, Mate
    Doczi, Tamas
    Buki, Andras
    Schwarcz, Attila
    IDEGGYOGYASZATI SZEMLE-CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 75 (1-2): : 62 - 69
  • [38] En bloc resections for primary spinal tumors in 20 years of experience: effectiveness and safety
    Amendola, Luca
    Cappuccio, Michele
    De Iure, Federico
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    Boriani, Stefano
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (11): : 2608 - 2617
  • [39] Should laterally spreading tumors granular type be resected en bloc in endoscopic resections?
    Imai, Kenichiro
    Hotta, Kinichi
    Yamaguchi, Yuichiro
    Tanaka, Masaki
    Kakushima, Naomi
    Takizawa, Kohei
    Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki
    Kawata, Noboru
    Igarashi, Kimihiro
    Sugimoto, Shinya
    Yoshida, Masao
    Oishi, Takuma
    Mori, Keita
    Ono, Hiroyuki
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (07): : 2167 - 2173
  • [40] En bloc resection of primary malignant bone tumors of the cervical spine
    Mattei, Tobias A.
    Mendel, Ehud
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2014, 156 (11) : 2159 - 2164