Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Teresa Urbano
Marco Vinceti
Lauren A. Wise
Tommaso Filippini
机构
[1] University of Modena and Reggio Emilia,CREAGEN
[2] Boston University School of Public Health, Environmental, Genetic and Nutritional Epidemiology Research Center, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences
关键词
Breast cancer; Light-at-night; Lighting; Menopausal status; Dose–response meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second leading cause of cancer death overall. Besides genetic, reproductive, and hormonal factors involved in disease onset and progression, greater attention has focused recently on the etiologic role of environmental factors, including exposure to artificial lighting such as light-at-night (LAN). We investigated the extent to which LAN, including outdoor and indoor exposure, affects breast cancer risk. We performed a systematic review of epidemiological evidence on the association between LAN exposure and breast cancer risk, using a dose–response meta-analysis to examine the shape of the relation. We retrieved 17 eligible studies through September 13, 2021, including ten cohort and seven case–control studies. In the analysis comparing highest versus lowest LAN exposure, we found a positive association between exposure and disease risk (risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval-CI 1.07–1.15), with comparable associations in case–control studies (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98–1.34) and cohort studies (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15). In stratified analyses, risk was similar for outdoor and indoor LAN exposure, while slightly stronger risks were observed for premenopausal women (premenopausal: RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04–1.28; postmenopausal: 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13) and for women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (ER + : RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.17; ER–: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92–1.23). The dose–response meta-analysis, performed only in studies investigating outdoor LAN using comparable exposure assessment, showed a linear relation up to 40 nW/cm2/sr after which the curve flattened, especially among premenopausal women. This first assessment of the dose–response relation between LAN and breast cancer supports a positive association in selected subgroups, particularly in premenopausal women.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic review and meta-analysis on tubal ligation and breast cancer risk
    Nazila Najdi
    Arezoo Esmailzadeh
    Maryam Shokrpour
    Somayeh Nikfar
    Seyedeh Zahra Razavi
    Mahdi Sepidarkish
    Saman Maroufizadeh
    Saeid Safiri
    Amir Almasi-Hashiani
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [42] Folate intake and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martin Tio
    Juliana Andrici
    Guy D. Eslick
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 145 : 513 - 524
  • [43] Digitalis Use and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Chen
    Xie, Shao-Hua
    Xu, Bingfei
    Lu, Shi
    Liu, Pian
    DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 40 (04) : 285 - 292
  • [44] Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
    Park, Sue Kyung
    Kang, Daehee
    McGlynn, Katherine A.
    Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
    Kim, Yeonju
    Yoo, Keun Young
    Brinton, Louise A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (01)
  • [45] Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Brennan, Sarah F.
    Cantwell, Marie M.
    Cardwell, Chris R.
    Velentzis, Louiza S.
    Woodside, Jayne V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2010, 91 (05): : 1294 - 1302
  • [46] Breast cancer risk factors in Iran: A systematic review & meta-analysis
    Shamshirian, A.
    Heydari, K.
    Shams, Z.
    Aref, A. R.
    Shamshirian, D.
    Tamtaji, O. R.
    Asemi, Z.
    Mirzaei, H.
    Mohammadi, N.
    Zibaee, B.
    Karimifar, K.
    Zarandi, B.
    Hedayatizadeh-Omran, A.
    Alizadeh-Navaei, R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S318 - S318
  • [47] Brassiere wearing and breast cancer risk:A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Winnie KW So
    Dorothy NS Chan
    Yan Lou
    Kai-Chow Choi
    Carmen WH Chan
    Kristina Shin
    Ava Kwong
    Diana TF Lee
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2015, (04) : 193 - 205
  • [48] Primary HT and risk for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Angelousi, Anna G.
    Anagnostou, Valsamo K.
    Stamatakos, Michael K.
    Georgiopoulos, Georgios A.
    Kontzoglou, Konstantinos C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 166 (03) : 373 - 381
  • [49] Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
    Sue Kyung Park
    Daehee Kang
    Katherine A McGlynn
    Montserrat Garcia-Closas
    Yeonju Kim
    Keun Young Yoo
    Louise A Brinton
    Breast Cancer Research, 10
  • [50] Risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akdeniz, D.
    Schmidt, M. K.
    McCool, D.
    van den Broek, A. J.
    Hauptmann, M.
    Seynaeve, C. M.
    Steyerberg, E. W.
    Hooning, M. J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77