A comparative study of oxygen diffusion in tissue engineering scaffolds

被引:0
|
作者
T. Fiedler
I. V. Belova
G. E. Murch
G. Poologasundarampillai
J. R. Jones
J. A. Roether
A. R. Boccaccini
机构
[1] The University of Newcastle,School of Engineering
[2] Imperial College London,Department of Materials
[3] University of Erlangen-Nuremberg,Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Polymer Materials
[4] University of Erlangen-Nuremberg,Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials
关键词
Oxygen Diffusion; Bioactive Glass; Tissue Engineering Scaffold; Strut Thickness; Tissue Phase;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Tissue engineering scaffolds are designed to support tissue self-healing within physiological environments by promoting the attachment, growth and differentiation of relevant cells. Newly formed tissue must be supplied with sufficient levels of oxygen to prevent necrosis. Oxygen diffusion is the major transport mechanism before vascularization is completed and oxygen is predominantly supplied via blood vessels. The present study compares different designs for scaffolds in the context of their oxygen diffusion ability. In all cases, oxygen diffusion is confined to the scaffold pores that are assumed to be completely occupied by newly formed tissue. The solid phase of the scaffolds acts as diffusion barrier that locally inhibits oxygen diffusion, i.e. no oxygen passes through the scaffold material. As a result, the oxygen diffusivity is determined by the scaffold porosity and pore architecture. Lattice Monte Carlo simulations are performed to compare the normalized oxygen diffusivities in scaffolds obtained by the foam replication (FR) method, robocasting and sol–gel foaming. Scaffolds made by the FR method were found to have the highest oxygen diffusivity due to their high porosity and interconnected pores. These structures enable the best oxygen supply for newly formed tissue among the scaffold types considered according to the present numerical predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:2573 / 2578
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffolds
    Lannutti, J.
    Reneker, D.
    Ma, T.
    Tomasko, D.
    Farson, D. F.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-BIOMIMETIC AND SUPRAMOLECULAR SYSTEMS, 2007, 27 (03): : 504 - 509
  • [42] Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
    Kim, Taek Gyoung
    Shin, Heungsoo
    Lim, Dong Woo
    ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2012, 22 (12) : 2446 - 2468
  • [43] NOVEL SCAFFOLDS FOR TISSUE ENGINEERING
    Stamatialis, D.
    Papenburg, B.
    de Boer, J.
    van Blitterswijk, C.
    Wessling, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2008, 31 (07): : 615 - 615
  • [44] Interconnectivity of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
    Reinwald, Y.
    Lemon, G.
    Rahman, C.
    Shakesheff, K. M.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 62 (10) : 1509 - 1510
  • [45] Polymeric Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
    Li, Xiaoming
    Akasaka, Tsukasa
    Dunne, Nicholas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, 2014, 2014
  • [46] Microfluidic scaffolds for tissue engineering
    Nak Won Choi
    Mario Cabodi
    Brittany Held
    Jason P. Gleghorn
    Lawrence J. Bonassar
    Abraham D. Stroock
    Nature Materials, 2007, 6 : 908 - 915
  • [47] Biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering
    Bhatnagar, RS
    Li, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2004, 26 : 5021 - 5023
  • [48] Tissue engineering scaffolds containing embedded fluorinated-zeolite oxygen vectors
    Seifu, Dawit G.
    Isimjan, Tayirjan T.
    Mequanint, Kibret
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2011, 7 (10) : 3670 - 3678
  • [49] Fabrication of Vascular Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Enhanced Oxygen Diffusivity and Cell Infiltration
    Seifu, Dawit G.
    Mequanint, Kibret
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2012, 2 (04) : 280 - 291
  • [50] Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds
    Leong, K. F.
    Chua, C. K.
    Sudarmadji, N.
    Yeong, W. Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2008, 1 (02) : 140 - 152