An implementation plan for using biological indicators to improve assessment of water quality in Thailand

被引:0
|
作者
Boonsatien Boonsoong
Narumon Sangpradub
Michael T. Barbour
Wijarn Simachaya
机构
[1] Kasetsart University,Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science
[2] Khon Kaen University,Applied Taxonomic Research Center, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science
[3] Tetra Tech,Center for Ecological Sciences
[4] Inc.,Air Quality and Noise Management Bureau, Pollution Control Department
[5] Ministry of Natural Resource and Environment,undefined
来源
关键词
Water quality; Biological indicators; Benthic macroinvertebrates; Thai streams; Water resource management; Bioassessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most national standards for assessment of water quality include physical and chemical indicators relevant to specific pollutants and stressors. However, biological communities reflect not only current conditions of aquatic resources but also change in conditions over time and impacts from multiple stressors. Assessing the health of the aquatic community (that is, bioassessments) has proven to be critical in protecting and maintaining healthy surface waters under the mandates of regulatory frameworks, such as the Clean Water Act in the USA and the Water Framework Directive of the European Union. Whereas, in Thailand water standards, bioassessment is lacking in favor of chemical criteria, only coliform bacteria measurement can be considered a surrogate biological parameter. Our paper argues that incorporating bioassessment will improve water resource condition evaluations and recommends the use of the benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage as a bioassessment framework in Thailand. We discuss the implementation of a bioassessment program that consists of two major components, (a) a scientifically valid technical approach and (b) consideration of technical resources for a cost-effective program. The technical design comprises (1) classification of streams into similar groupings, (2) design of a biological survey, (3) a well-documented sampling protocol, (4) calibration of biological metrics for data analysis, (5) development of criteria for determination of ecological condition, and (6) communication of the results to citizens and policymakers. A cost-effective way to develop a bioassessment program that will improve Thailand’s ability to measure water quality and to make good decisions to attain healthy quality status is to establish partnerships by coordinating efforts and sharing data and technology with adjacent regional environmental offices or provinces. This collaboration would be fostered through a long-term national water resources management strategy and clear definition of goals and desired outcomes that are critical components of the overall National Plan for Ecological Health.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 215
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An integrated approach for water quality assessment in African catchments based on physico-chemical and biological indicators
    Dessie, Bitew K.
    Aschale, Minbale
    Polaine, Xanthe
    Melaku, Samuel
    Alamirew, Tena
    Walsh, Claire L.
    Werner, David
    Zeleke, Gete
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 908
  • [22] Implementation of a safety checklist to improve quality and safety of physician plan review process
    de los Santos, L. Fong
    Park, S.
    Olivier, K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S912 - S913
  • [23] Assessment of risks to the quality of water supplied in Bushenyi-Uganda using the water safety plan approach
    Kanyesigye, Christopher
    Twesigye, Innocent
    Marks, Sara
    Niwagaba, Charles
    Kulabako, Robinah
    Ferrero, Giuliana
    Kansiime, Frank
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 18 (12) : 2989 - 3003
  • [24] Biological Indicators of Water Quality of Drenova Reservoir (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
    D. Golub
    D. Dmitrović
    S. Lolić
    G. Šukalo
    R. Dekić
    R. Tošić
    Inland Water Biology, 2023, 16 : 583 - 592
  • [25] The Role of Biological Indicators in a State Water Quality Management Process
    Chris O. Yoder
    Edward T. Rankin
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1998, 51 : 61 - 88
  • [26] The role of biological indicators in a state water quality management process
    Yoder, CO
    Rankin, ET
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1998, 51 (1-2) : 61 - 88
  • [27] Biological Indicators of Water Quality of Drenova Reservoir (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
    Golub, D.
    Dmitrovic, D.
    Lolic, S.
    Sukalo, G.
    Dekic, R.
    Tosic, R.
    INLAND WATER BIOLOGY, 2023, 16 (04) : 583 - 592
  • [28] The Selection of Monitoring Indicators for River Water Quality Assessment
    Liu, Y.
    Zheng, B. H.
    Fu, Q.
    Wang, L. J.
    Wang, M.
    18TH BIENNIAL ISEM CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL MODELLING FOR GLOBAL CHANGE AND COUPLED HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEM, 2012, 13 : 129 - 139
  • [29] ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY AND SAFETY INDICATORS OF DRINKING AND PROCESS WATER
    Lovkis, Zenon, V
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF BELARUS-AGRARIAN SERIES, 2023, 61 (01): : 78 - 86
  • [30] Water, quality assessment of Kavvayi Lake of northern Kerala, India using CCME water quality index and biological water quality criteria
    Shiji, M.
    Sabitha, A. R.
    Prabhakar, Kavya
    Harikumar, P. S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (06): : 1265 - 1272