Comparative Expedited Regulatory Programs of U.S Food & Drug Administration and Project Orbis Partners

被引:0
|
作者
Lauren T. Hotaki
Anu Shrestha
Monica P. Bennett
Ivelisse L. Valdes
Sso H. Lee
Yinghua Wang
Dianne Spillman
Tina MacAulay
Melissa Hunt
Julie Gervais
Maral Mafi
Vincent Panetta
Yee Hoo Looi
Michael Shum
Eiman Atiek
Ricarda Meincke
Ulrich-Peter Rohr
Denize Ainbinder
Anat Boehm-Cagan
Osnat Luxenburg
Mateus Rodrigues Cerqueira
Laila Sofia Mouawad
Maria Fernanda Reis e Silva Thees
Krishna Prasad
R. Angelo de Claro
机构
[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration,The Medical Technologies, Health Information, Innovation and Research Directorate
[2] Oncology Center for Excellence,undefined
[3] Office of Oncologic Diseases,undefined
[4] Division of Regulatory Operations for Oncologic Diseases,undefined
[5] The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences,undefined
[6] University of Florida College of Pharmacy,undefined
[7] University of Georgia College of Pharmacy,undefined
[8] Health Canada,undefined
[9] Health Sciences Authority,undefined
[10] Therapeutic Goods Administration,undefined
[11] Swissmedic,undefined
[12] Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products,undefined
[13] Ministry of Health,undefined
[14] Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency,undefined
[15] Hon Consultant,undefined
[16] DD Innovative Medicines,undefined
[17] Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency,undefined
[18] St Thomas’s Hospital,undefined
关键词
Global; Priority; Authorization; Oncology; Collaboration; Accelerated;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Project Orbis was initiated in May 2019 by the Oncology Center of Excellence to facilitate faster patient access to innovative cancer therapies by providing a framework for concurrent submissions and review of oncology products among international partners. Since its inception, Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Canada's Health Canada (HC), Singapore's Health Sciences Authority (HSA), Switzerland's Swissmedic (SMC), Brazil's National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and most recently Israel's Ministry of Health (IMoH) Medical Technologies, Health Information, Innovation and Research (MTIIR) Directorate, have joined Project Orbis. While each country has its own expedited review pathways to bring promising therapies to patients, there are some similarities and differences in pathways and timelines. FDA’s fast-track designation and MHRA’s marketing authorization under exceptional circumstances (MAEC) allow non-clinical and limited clinical evidence to support approval under these programs. HC's Extraordinary Use New Drug (EUND) pathway allows granting exceptional use authorization with limited clinical evidence. ANVISA, HSA, MTIIR, and TGA do not have standard pathways that allow non-clinical evidence and limited clinical evidence. While there is no definite regulatory pathway for HSA, the current framework for approval does allow flexibility in the type of data (non-clinical or clinical) required to demonstrate the benefit–risk profile of a product. HSA may register a product if the agency is satisfied that the overall benefit outweighs the risk. All Project Orbis Partner (POP) countries have similar programs to the FDA accelerated approval program except ANVISA. Although HSA and MTIIR do not have defined pathways for accelerated approval programs, there are opportunities to request accelerated approval per these agencies. All POP countries have pathways like the FDA priority review except MHRA. Priority review timelines for new drugs range from 120 to 264 calendar days (cd). Standard review timelines for new drugs range from 180 to 365 cd.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 885
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Key evidence supporting prescription opioids approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration, 1997-2018
    Heyward, James
    Moore, Thomas J.
    Chen, Jennifer
    Meek, Kristin
    Lurie, Peter
    Alexander, Caleb
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 167 - 168
  • [12] Nanotechnology and the U.S. food and drug administration
    Marlowe, Donald E.
    Standardization News, 2005, 33 (07) : 28 - 31
  • [13] For Consumers - U.S. Food and Drug Administration
    Bihn, Clara
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2024, 28 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [14] A Comparative Study of the Academic Programs between Informatics/Biolnformatics and Data Science in the U.S
    Hassan, Ismail Bile
    Liu, Jigang
    2020 IEEE 44TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC 2020), 2020, : 165 - 171
  • [15] Cardiac resynchronization devices - The food and drug administration's regulatory considerations
    Moynahan, M
    Faris, OP
    Lewis, BM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (12) : 2325 - 2328
  • [16] U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approves Veltin Gel
    不详
    JOURNAL OF DRUGS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 9 (10) : 1306 - 1306
  • [17] The Nutrition Facts Label - U.S. Food and Drug Administration
    Beckwell, Jillian
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2025, 29 (01) : 86 - 100
  • [18] Nuclear methods for food analysis at the U. S. Food and Drug Administration
    P. Mackill
    Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2001, 249 (1) : 29 - 32
  • [19] Use of US Food and Drug Administration Expedited Drug Development and Review Programs by Orphan and Nonorphan Novel Drugs Approved From 2008 to 2021
    Monge, Andrea N.
    Sigelman, Daniel W.
    Temple, Robert J.
    Chahal, Harinder Singh
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (11) : e2239336
  • [20] Commercial health plans use of patient subgroup restrictions: An analysis of orphan and US Food and Drug Administration-expedited programs
    Jenkins, Nola B.
    Rucker, Julia A.
    Klimchak, Alexa C.
    Sedita, Lauren E.
    Chambers, James
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2023, 29 (05): : 472 - 479