Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol

被引:0
|
作者
ZhanBo Wen
Long Yu
WenHui Yang
LingFei Hu
Na Li
Jie Wang
JinSong Li
JianChun Lu
XiaoKai Dong
Zhe Yin
Ke Zhang
机构
[1] Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology,State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity
来源
Aerobiologia | 2013年 / 29卷
关键词
Viral aerosol; Protection efficiency; Personal respiratory protection equipments;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
New viral disease such as SARS and H1N1 highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare workers to aerosol-transmitted viral infections. This paper was to assess the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection equipments against viral aerosol. Surgical masks, N95 masks and N99 masks were purchased from the market. The masks were sealed onto the manikin in the aerosol testing chamber. Viral aerosol was generated and then sampled simultaneously before and after the tested mask using biosamplers. This allows a percentage efficiency value to be calculated against test phage SM702 aerosols which surrogates of viral pathogens aerosol. At the same time, the masks face fit factor was determined by TSI8020. The viral aerosol particles aerodynamic diameter was 0.744 μm, and GSD was 1.29. The protection performance of the material of all the tested masks against viral aerosol was all >95 %. All the five surgical masks face fit factor were <8. F model N95 mask and H model N99 mask face fit factor were all >160. G model N95 mask face fit factor was 8.2. The protection performances of N95 or N99 masks were many times higher than surgical mask when considering the face fit factor. Surgical masks cannot offer sufficient protection against the inhalation of viral aerosol because they cannot provide a close face seal.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 372
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices
    Lawrence, Robert B.
    Duling, Matthew G.
    Calvert, Catherine A.
    Coffey, Christopher C.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2006, 3 (09) : 465 - 474
  • [22] SURGICAL MASKS, AN EFFECTIVE PROTECTION AGAINST CYTOSTATIC AEROSOLS
    KORN, M
    NDHLOVU, D
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1989, 114 (46) : 1785 - 1788
  • [23] Does wearing masks offer protection against viruses?
    Donaldson, Alex
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2020, 187 (03) : 119 - 119
  • [24] Personal respiratory protection and prevention of occupational tuberculosis
    Fennelly, KP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2005, 9 (05) : 476 - 476
  • [25] Use of personal protective equipment for respiratory protection
    Sargent, EV
    Gallo, F
    ILAR JOURNAL, 2003, 44 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [26] ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL HEARING PROTECTION IN PRACTICE
    SMOORENBURG, GF
    MIMPEN, TM
    SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1982, : 13 - 22
  • [27] Speech Impaired by Half Masks Used for the Respiratory Tract Protection
    Nowacki, Krzysztof
    Lakomy, Karolina
    Marczak, Wojciech
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (12)
  • [28] Biodegradable Particle Filtering Half-masks for Respiratory Protection
    Krucinska, Izabella
    Strzembosz, Wiktor
    Majchrzycka, Katarzyna
    Brochocka, Agnieszka
    Sulak, Konrad
    FIBRES & TEXTILES IN EASTERN EUROPE, 2012, 20 (6B) : 77 - 83
  • [29] Protection against aerosol threats with fibrous filters
    Hayashi T.
    Journal of Fiber Science and Technology, 2021, 77 (03): : 114 - 119
  • [30] Examination of respiratory protection masks by microorganism-equivalence-aerosols
    Hillemann, L.
    Helmke, G.
    Ahlert, B.
    Stintz, M.
    Mueller, K. W.
    Ripperger, S.
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2006, 66 (09): : 383 - 387