Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence in different densities of spring barley

被引:0
|
作者
Daiva Janušauskaitė
Ona Auškalnienė
Gabrielė Pšibišauskienė
机构
[1] Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry,Institute of Agriculture
来源
关键词
L.; Varieties; Seed rate; Chlorophyll fluorescence; Grain yield;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over the period 2008–2009, field experiments were carried out at the Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture on an Endocalcari-Epihypogleyic Cambisol (CMg-p-w-can). The study was aimed to establish the effects of spring barley crop stand density on the chlorophyll fluorescence and to estimate the relationship between grain yield and chlorophyll fluorescence value. The tests involved three spring barley varieties—Aura DS, Barke and Gustav. The three different stand densities were formed with seed rates of two, four and six million viable seeds per hectare. Our research findings indicated that increasing spring barley stand density did not exert any negative influence on major photosynthetic processes and did not result in any significant qualitative changes in light harvesting system. A significant varietal (factor B) influence was established on minimum fluorescence (Fo) and maximum fluorescence (Fm) values after short dark adaptation indicators (Ffact. = 19.66** and Ffact. = 9.33**, respectively). Growth stage (factor C) significantly influenced all fluorescence indicators—Fo, Fm and quantum efficiency of PSII after short dark adaptation (Fv/Fm)—in the five cases of the six tested. A significant effect of variety and growth stage interaction (B × C) was determined for 66.7% of the tested cases. The article presents a correlation between the grain yield of spring barley and fluorescence parameters. In most cases, the correlation was strong and significant. The interaction between the fluorescence parameters for individual varieties was responsible for 53.8–76.2% of grain yield data variation, which averaged over all varieties, amounted to 21.9–46.1%.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE TRANSIENTS IN A BARLEY MUTANT LACKING PHOTOSYSTEM-I
    JUHLER, RK
    MILLER, M
    SIMPSON, D
    COX, RP
    PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH, 1993, 35 (03) : 305 - 310
  • [32] HEAT INJURY OF BARLEY LEAVES DETECTED BY THE CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE TEMPERATURE CURVE
    NAUS, J
    KUROPATWA, R
    KLINKOVSKY, T
    ILIK, P
    LATTOVA, J
    PAVLOVA, Z
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1992, 1101 (03) : 359 - 362
  • [33] Relation of Leaf Image, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Reflectance and SPAD in Rice and Barley
    Hu, Hao
    Fang, Shibo
    2013 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS (AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS), 2013, : 28 - 31
  • [34] Estimation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence at Different Scales: A Review
    Ni, Zhuoya
    Lu, Qifeng
    Huo, Hongyuan
    Zhang, Huili
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (13)
  • [35] RELATION OF LIGHT REFLECTANCE OF SIX BARLEY LINES WITH CHLOROPHYLL ASSAYS AND OPTICAL FILM DENSITIES
    CARDENAS, R
    GAUSMAN, HW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1973, 65 (03) : 518 - 519
  • [36] Evaluation of spring barley genotypes with different susceptibility to Fusarium head blight using molecular markers
    Nesvadba, Z.
    Vyhnanek, T.
    Jeziskova, I.
    Tvaruzek, L.
    Spunarova, M.
    Spunar, J.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 52 (11) : 485 - 491
  • [37] Evaluation of drought-related traits and screening methods at different developmental stages in spring barley
    Szira, F.
    Balint, A. F.
    Boerner, A.
    Galiba, G.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2008, 194 (05) : 334 - 342
  • [38] THE DROUGHT EFFECT ON PRODUCTIVITY OF DIFFERENT SPRING BARLEY GENOTYPES
    Presinszka, M.
    Kovar, M.
    MENDELNET 2013, 2013, : 664 - 668
  • [39] YIELD COMPONENT COMPENSATION AT DIFFERENT SPRING BARLEY YIELDS
    TICHY, F
    PALIK, S
    KOPECKY, M
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1992, 38 (3-4): : 253 - 261
  • [40] QTL analysis of Chlorophyll Content at different growth stages of Barley
    Niu, Chunyu
    Cen, Qiwen
    Chen, Yuyu
    Yan, Jiajie
    Ding, Niu
    Zhang, Xiaoqin
    Zhang, Xian
    Wu, Yuhuan
    Fang, Yunxia
    Xue, Dawei
    PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2022, 98 (03) : 491 - 497