Quality by Design and Process Analytical Technology for Sterile Products—Where Are We Now?

被引:0
|
作者
Bryan S. Riley
Xuhong Li
机构
[1] FDA,Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER
来源
AAPS PharmSciTech | 2011年 / 12卷
关键词
process analytical technology (PAT); quality by design (QbD); sterile product;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quality by design (QbD) and process analytical technology (PAT) have become priorities for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Numerous recent initiatives within CDER and FDA have had the objective of encouraging the pharmaceutical industry to utilize QbD and PAT in their product development and manufacturing processes. Although sterile products may be a minority compared to non-sterile dosage forms (e.g., solid orals), their absolute requirement for sterility make design and control of the manufacturing processes extremely critical. This emphasis on the manufacturing process makes the sterile drug product an obvious target for QbD and PAT. Although the FDA encourages QbD submissions, the utilization of QbD and PAT for sterile products so far is still limited. This paper will examine the present state of QbD and PAT for sterile products and review some examples currently in use. Additional potential applications of QbD and PAT for sterile product development and manufacturing will also be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 118
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evolution of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Design Rationales and Where We Are Now
    Shah, Anup A.
    Sheth, Mihir
    Mckee, Michael
    Lederman, Evan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2025, 33 (02) : e61 - e71
  • [42] BIOT 166-Quality by design and process analytical technology for freeze drying
    Pikal, Michael
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 234
  • [43] Pharmaceutical manufacturing and the quality by design (QBD), process analytical technology (PAT) approach
    Murphy, Trevor
    O'Mahony, Niall
    Panduru, Krishna
    Riordan, Daniel
    Walsh, Joseph
    2016 27TH IRISH SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ISSC), 2016,
  • [44] UPTAKE OF JOINTLY PRODUCED EUNETHTA HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS: WHERE ARE WE NOW?
    Garrett, Z.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S203 - S203
  • [45] Clinical trial design for Friedreich ataxia - Where are we now and what do we need?
    Rummey, Christian
    Kichula, Elizabeth
    Lynch, David R.
    EXPERT OPINION ON ORPHAN DRUGS, 2018, 6 (03): : 219 - 230
  • [46] Assessing the quality of life of cancer patients: Where are we now? A European perspective
    Cull, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S311 - S311
  • [47] Strategic framework for education and training in Quality by Design (QbD) and process analytical technology (PAT)
    de Matas, Marcel
    De Beer, Thomas
    Folestad, Staffan
    Ketolainen, Jarkko
    Linden, Hans
    Lopes, Joao Almeida
    Oostra, Wim
    Weimer, Marco
    Ohrngren, Per
    Rantanen, Jukka
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 90 : 2 - 7
  • [48] Process Analytical Technology (PAT) and Quality by Design (QbD) in the regulatory environment of the pharmaceutical industry
    Schmidt-Bader T.
    Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik, 2010, 82 (04) : 415 - 428
  • [49] Towards Quality by Design and process analytical technology for enhanced nutrient recovery from wastewaters
    Céline Vaneeckhaute
    npj Clean Water, 2
  • [50] Emerging analytical techniques for pharmaceutical quality control: Where are we in 2022?
    Dispas, Amandine
    Sacre, Pierre-Yves
    Ziemons, Eric
    Hubert, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 221