Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial

被引：0
|
作者：
Sebiha Özkan
Eray Çalışkan
Emek Doğer
İzzet Yücesoy
Semih Özeren
Birol Vural
机构：
[1] Kocaeli University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
来源：
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2009年 / 280卷
关键词：
Misoprostol; Dinoprostone; Labor induction;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：19 / 24
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Misoprostol vaginal insert (Mysodelle) versus Dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin) for induction of labour
    Sharp, A.
    Faluyi, D.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 : 41 - 44
  • [42] Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial
    Mundle, WR
    Young, DC
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04): : 521 - 525
  • [43] Oral misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term
    Faucett, Allison
    Daniels, Kay
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Lee, Henry
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S53 - S53
  • [44] Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labour: Delivery outcomes and comparison with Dinoprostone
    Clark, A.
    Taggart, H.
    Noori, M.
    O'Dwyer, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 38 - 38
  • [45] Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor
    Mayer, Richard Bernhard
    Oppelt, Peter
    Shebl, Omar
    Poemer, Joachim
    Allerstorfer, Christina
    Weiss, Christoph
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 200 : 89 - 93
  • [46] Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Mogharbel, Hussain
    Rozzah, Rayyan
    D'Souza, Rohan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S177 - S178
  • [47] Comparison of Misoprostol for Labor Induction: Vaginal Insert Versus Oral Application Concerning Efficiency and Safety
    Ratiu, Dominik
    Hunke, Mirka
    Ratiu, Jessika
    Mallmann-Gottschalk, Nina
    Mallmann, Peter
    Baek, Sunhwa
    Gruettner, Berthold
    Hide-Moser, Katherina
    IN VIVO, 2024, 38 (05): : 2349 - 2357
  • [48] Is Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol Better Than Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Madaan, Monika
    Agrawal, Swati
    Puri, Manju
    Nigam, Aruna
    Kaur, Harvinder
    Trivedi, Shubha Sagar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 8 (09) : OC31 - OC34
  • [49] Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: A randomized controlled trial
    Paungmora, N
    Herabutya, Y
    O-Prasertsawat, P
    Punyavachira, P
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2004, 30 (05) : 358 - 362
  • [50] COST-EFFECTIVENESS IN LABOR INDUCTION WITH DINOPROSTONE OR VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL
    Francisco Javier, Carrera Hueso
    Barrios Auxiliadora, Ramon
    Jaime E, Poquet Jornet
    Fernandez Fernando, Conde
    Hernandez Jorge, Garcia
    Perez Manuel, Hernandez
    ATENCION FARMACEUTICA, 2012, 14 (02): : 81 - +
12345