Performance evaluation of laser tracker kinematic models and parameter identification

被引:1
|
作者
J. Conte
A. C. Majarena
R. Acero
J. Santolaria
J. J. Aguilar
机构
[1] Universidad de Zaragoza,Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering
[2] Centro Universitario de la Defensa Zaragoza,undefined
关键词
Laser tracker; Synthetic generator; Modelling; Kinematic parameter identification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A new kinematic model for a laser tracker is presented in this paper. This model obtains the kinematic parameters by the coordinate transformation matrices between successive reference systems based on the Denavit-Hartenberg method. The ASME B89.4.19 Standard provides some ranging tests, length measurement system tests and two-face system tests that can be performed to analyze the performance of the laser tracker. However, these tests take a lot of time and require specialized equipment. Another problem is that the end user cannot apply the manufacturer’s model because he cannot measure physical errors. The kinematic model developed has been compared with a geometric model based on modelling physical errors. To do this, the laser tracker kinematic model has been presented and validated using a mesh with synthetic reflector coordinates and known error parameters. The laser tracker has then been calibrated, in an easy and fast way, with experimental data using the measurements obtained by a coordinate measuring machine as nominal values. The calibration has been performed with both the kinematic model presented in this work and the geometric model based on physical errors. A comparison of both calibrations has been made, analyzing the performance of both models. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the length measurement system tests is presented to recommend the more suitable positions to perform the calibration procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1364
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance Evaluation of Learning Models for Identification of Suicidal Thoughts
    Chadha, Akshma
    Kaushik, Baijnath
    COMPUTER JOURNAL, 2022, 65 (01): : 139 - 154
  • [32] Kinematic calibration of a 3-DoF rotational parallel manipulator using laser tracker
    Sun, Tao
    Zhai, Yapu
    Song, Yimin
    Zhang, Jiateng
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2016, 41 : 78 - 91
  • [33] Kinematic calibration of a laser tracker based on nonlinear optimization of a refined geometric error model
    Chen, Xiaopeng
    Liu, Yanyang
    Xu, Yang
    Gou, Siyuan
    Ma, Siyan
    Ullah, Zakir
    MEASUREMENT, 2022, 191
  • [34] Uncertainty Estimation for Kinematic Laser Tracker Measurements Incorporating the Control Information of an Industrial Robot
    Ulrich, Thomas
    Irgenfried, Stephan
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDOOR POSITIONING AND INDOOR NAVIGATION (IPIN), 2014, : 68 - 76
  • [35] Robot kinematic parameters compensation by measuring distance error using laser tracker system
    Du, Liang
    Zhang, Tie
    Dai, Xiaoliang
    Hongwai yu Jiguang Gongcheng/Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2015, 44 (08): : 2351 - 2357
  • [36] An Information Theoretic Approach for Tracker Performance Evaluation
    Kao, Edward K.
    Daggett, Matthew P.
    Hurley, Michael B.
    2009 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV), 2009, : 1523 - 1529
  • [37] Kinematic Parameter Identification of Industrial Robot Based on Binocular Vision
    Shi, Yanqiong
    Li, Kefan
    Lu, Rongsheng
    Zhou, Xiyong
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2023, 60 (14)
  • [38] Laser Tracker and Terrestrial Laser Scanner Range Error Evaluation by Stitching
    Muralikrishnan, Bala
    Czapla, Braden
    Lee, Vincent
    Shakarji, Craig
    Sawyer, Daniel
    Saure, Matthias
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (10)
  • [39] Analysis of Kinematic Parameter Identification Method Based on Genetic Algorithm
    Yang, Jing
    Jin, Lingyan
    Han, Zejie
    Zhao, Deming
    Hu, Ming
    INTELLIGENT ROBOTICS AND APPLICATIONS, ICIRA 2021, PT I, 2021, 13013 : 119 - 128
  • [40] A LINEAR SOLUTION TO THE KINEMATIC PARAMETER-IDENTIFICATION OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS
    ZHUANG, H
    ROTH, ZS
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1993, 9 (02): : 174 - 185