The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule.
机构:
Connecticut Coll, Dept Comp Sci, New London, CT 06320 USAConnecticut Coll, Dept Comp Sci, New London, CT 06320 USA
Chung, Christine
Ligett, Katrina
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
CALTECH, Dept Comp & Math Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
CALTECH, Div Human & Social Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USAConnecticut Coll, Dept Comp Sci, New London, CT 06320 USA
Ligett, Katrina
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Pruhs, Kirk
Roth, Aaron
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Penn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USAConnecticut Coll, Dept Comp Sci, New London, CT 06320 USA
机构:
Univ Colorado, Skaggs Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Anschutz Med Campus, Denver, CO 80202 USAUniv Colorado, Skaggs Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Anschutz Med Campus, Denver, CO 80202 USA
Campbell, Jonathan D.
Kalo, Zoltan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Eotvos Lorand Univ, Fac Social Sci, Inst Econ, Dept Hlth Policy & Econ, Budapest, Hungary
Syreon Res Inst, Budapest, HungaryUniv Colorado, Skaggs Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Anschutz Med Campus, Denver, CO 80202 USA