A calculator based on prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS V2) is a promising prostate cancer predictor

被引:0
|
作者
Hui Wang
Sheng Tai
Li Zhang
Jun Zhou
Chaozhao Liang
机构
[1] The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Department of Urology
[2] Anhui Medical University,The institute of Urology
[3] Anhui Medical University,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Genitourinary Diseases
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research is to develop a new tool to improve the performance of predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and reducing unnecessary biopsies. The clinical data of patients who were definitely diagnosed by prostate biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. PCa risks that include age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), free-PSA (fPSA), the ratio of fPSA to PSA (%fPSA), prostate volume (PV), digital rectal examination (DRE) and multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) were selected by univariate and multivariate analysis. The satisfactory risks were used to establish predictor (Prostate Biopsy Rating Scale, PBRS). The total score (TS) that was obtained from PBRS was performed to forecast PCa. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the net reclassification index (NRI) were used to compare the predictive ability. A total of 1078 cases were recruited. The mean values of TS in PCa and non-PCa were 15.94 ± 3.26 and 10.49 ± 3.36 points respectively. The AUC of PBRS was higher than PSA, PSAD and MP-MRI (0.87 vs. 0.75, 0.78, 0.80, respectively). PBRS can reduce unnecessary biopsies compared with PSA, PSAD and MP-MRI by up to 63%, 54% and 44%, respectively. In brief, PBRS is a promising predictor of forecasting PCa.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of PI-RADS V1 and PI-RADS V2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    He, Ying
    Cong, Ruochen
    Zhou, Jie
    Xu, Zhenyu
    Yang, Jushun
    Wang, Lin
    Xiao, Jing
    He, Bosheng
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [32] Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS V2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Chen, Frank
    Cen, Steven
    Palmer, Suzanne
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (09) : 1101 - 1106
  • [33] Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Nayana U. Patel
    Kimberly E. Lind
    Kavita Garg
    David Crawford
    Priya N. Werahera
    Sajal S. Pokharel
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 705 - 712
  • [34] Prostate cancer in PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 version 2.1: a comparison to previous PI-RADS versions
    Bogner, Katja
    Engelhard, Karl
    Wuest, Wolfgang
    Hamel, Sajad
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (06) : 2187 - 2196
  • [35] Prostate cancer in PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 version 2.1: a comparison to previous PI-RADS versions
    Katja Bogner
    Karl Engelhard
    Wolfgang Wuest
    Sajad Hamel
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2187 - 2196
  • [36] COMBINATION OF VERSION 2.0 PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PI-RADS) AND PERIPROSTATIC FAT THICKNESS ON MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI TO PREDICT THE PRESENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Cao, Yudong
    Cao, Min
    Chen, Yuke
    Yu, Wei
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Jin, Jie
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E819 - E819
  • [37] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS): What the radiologists need to know?
    Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
    El-Diasty, Tarek
    Elhendy, Ahmed
    Fahmy, Dalia
    EL-Adalany, Mohamed Ali
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 79 : 183 - 200
  • [38] Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of clinically significant prostate cancer based on the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS): an interobserver study
    Luo, N.
    Zhang, K.
    Zhu, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 133 - 133
  • [39] Is possible to rule out clinically significant prostate cancer using PI-RADS v2 for the assessment of prostate MRI?
    Cavacalla Viana, Publio Cesar
    Horvat, Natally
    dos Santos Junior, Vatter Ribeiro
    Lima, Thais Carneiro
    Romao, Davi dos Santos
    de Oliveira Cerri, Luciana Mendes
    de Castro, Marilia Germanos
    Vargas, Herbert Alberto
    Miranda, JOlia Azevedo
    Leite, Claudia da Costa
    Cerri, Giovanni Guido
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (04): : 724 - 731
  • [40] Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Shtern, Faina
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Cornud, Francois
    Choyke, Peter L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 41 - 49