Conflicts Between Trade Mark Rights and Freedom of Expression Under EU Trade Mark Law: Reality or Illusion?

被引:0
|
作者
Michal Bohaczewski
机构
[1] Dr.,
[2] Assistant Professor,undefined
[3] Faculty of Law and Administration,undefined
[4] University of Warsaw,undefined
关键词
Trade mark; Freedom of expression; Reputation; Due cause; Trade mark limitations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The issue of reconciling trade mark rights and freedom of expression is a classic question discussed by European scholars which has recently been reopened because of the express reference to “fundamental rights and freedoms, and in particular the freedom of expression” in the preambles of Directive 2015/2436 and of Regulation 2017/1001. In this article, the author argues that, in the light of the EU legislation, conflicts between the freedom of expression and trade mark rights are often illusory. Indeed, in this debate we focus too quickly on the question of resolving a potential conflict, while EU trade mark law itself provides for limits that guarantee respect of the freedom of expression. It should also be borne in mind that commercial expressions enjoy a more restricted freedom since they serve private economic interests and not the interests of society as a whole. The freedom of commercial expression therefore needs to be limited by trade mark rights which are also fundamental rights, having equivalent value. Consequently, it seems unnecessary to envisage use related to the freedom of expression, of a sign reproducing or imitating a trade mark, as a specific limitation of trade mark rights, either in the speciality or in the field of enhanced protection of trade marks with a reputation.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 877
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Applying the law on trade mark dilution
    Malynicz S.
    ERA Forum, 2015, 16 (1) : 49 - 60
  • [22] The evolution of trade mark law in China
    Zhang, Nan
    QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 2012, 2 (03) : 279 - 287
  • [23] Japanese trade mark law.
    Heath, C
    IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT LAW, 1999, 30 (04): : 485 - 486
  • [24] Contributory trade mark infringement liability: a comparison of US and EU law
    Bikoff, James L.
    Tzou, Darlene
    Sanders, J. Spencer, II
    Fokkema, Renske
    van den Broek, Gie
    van der Wal, Iris
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2019, 14 (11) : 842 - 849
  • [25] Korea's Trade Mark Law
    Siggers, Philip E.
    JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1955, 37 (06): : 439 - 443
  • [26] THE NEW TRADE-MARK LAW
    Borden, Neil H.
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1947, 25 (03) : 289 - 305
  • [27] Search and persuasion in trade mark law
    Beebe, B
    MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 2005, 103 (08) : 2020 - 2072
  • [28] A COMPENDIUM OF TRADE MARK LAW AND PRACTICE
    Stringham, Emerson
    JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1931, 13 (10): : 531 - 535
  • [29] Spare parts under European design and trade mark law
    Hartwig, Henning
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2016, 11 (02) : 121 - 129
  • [30] TRADE MARK LAW. A SEMIOTIC CLASSIFICATION OF TRADE MARKS
    Alvisa Morales, Alain
    SIGNA-REVISTA DE LA ASOCIACION ESPANOLA DE SEMIOTICA, 2014, 23 : 233 - 256