Is Economic Empowerment a Protective Factor Against Intimate Partner Violence? Evidence from Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Yasemin Dildar
机构
[1] California State University San Bernardino,Department of Economics
关键词
Economic empowerment; Intimate partner violence; Turkey; J12; J16; Z10;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyzes the relationship between women’s economic empowerment and the incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV) using data from the National Survey on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey (2008, 2014). Two hypotheses are tested: (i) women’s economic independence reduces the risk of partner violence as suggested by household bargaining models; (ii) women’s vulnerability to IPV increases when their economic situation improves relative to their partner’s as suggested by a male backlash model. Women’s employment has a positive effect on the exposure to IPV but it is not statistically significant after controlling for the simultaneous causality between employment status and IPV. Earning more income than their partners, on the other hand, lowers the risk of IPV by 9.3%, providing evidence for the household bargaining model. The protective effect of income differs according to class positions of women. Earning more income than their partners lowers the risk of physical (7.5%) and sexual violence (6.4%) for women in poor households while it lowers the risk of psychological violence (11.5%) for women in medium-wealth and rich households.
引用
收藏
页码:1695 / 1728
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Smartphones and attitudes to intimate partner violence: Evidence from Africa
    Gillanders, Robert
    McNamara, Glenn
    KYKLOS, 2024, 77 (02) : 411 - 427
  • [42] Socioeconomic Inequalities in Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Vietnam
    Dang, Truc Ngoc Hoang
    Le, Duc Dung
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2025, 40 (1-2) : 31 - 55
  • [43] INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE: TURKEY'S FEMICIDE PROBLEM
    Cilingiroglu, Nesrin
    Erbaydar, Nuket Paksoy
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2016, 22 : A143 - A143
  • [44] Risk Factors for Multiple Violations of Protective Orders in Intimate Partner Violence Against Women
    Caballe-Perez, Marta
    Santos-Hermoso, Jorge
    Lopez-Ossorio, Juan Jose
    Soria-Verde, Miguel Angel
    Amor, Pedro J.
    Gonzalez-Alvarez, Jose Luis
    VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS, 2024, 39 (01) : 21 - 37
  • [45] Intimate partner violence against Iranian women
    Mohammadbeigi, Abolfazl
    Sajadi, Mahbobeh
    Ahmadli, Robabeh
    Asgarian, Azadeh
    Khazaei, Salman
    Afrashteh, Sima
    Ansari, Hossein
    NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2019, 32 (02): : 67 - 71
  • [46] Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women
    Fontanil, Y
    Ezama, E
    Fernández, R
    Gil, P
    Herrero, FJ
    Paz, D
    PSICOTHEMA, 2005, 17 (01) : 90 - 95
  • [47] Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Zimbabwe
    Fidan, Ahmet
    Bui, Hoan N.
    VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2016, 22 (09) : 1075 - 1096
  • [48] Intimate Partner Violence in Tajikistan: Risk and Protective Factors
    Chernyak, Elena
    VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS, 2018, 33 (06) : 1124 - 1147
  • [49] Screening for intimate partner violence against women
    Brzank, P.
    Blaettner, B.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2010, 53 (2-3) : 221 - 232
  • [50] The protective role of social support and intimate partner violence
    Plazaola-Castano, Juncal
    Ruiz-Perez, Isabel
    Isabel Montero-Pinar, Maria
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2008, 22 (06) : 527 - 533