Evaluating the impact of dyslexia laws on the identification of specific learning disability and dyslexia

被引:0
|
作者
B. Anne Barber Phillips
Timothy N. Odegard
机构
[1] Middle Tennessee State University,
来源
Annals of Dyslexia | 2017年 / 67卷
关键词
Dyslexia; Legislation; Prevalence; Specific learning disability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that impacts word reading accuracy and/or reading fluency. Over half of the states in the USA have passed legislation intended to promote better identification of individuals with dyslexia. To date, no study has been conducted to investigate the potential impact of state laws on the identification of specific learning disability (SLD), and limited data has been presented on the rate at which students in public school settings are identified with dyslexia. The first aim of the current study was to determine if any detectable changes in the identification rates of SLD have occurred in states implementing dyslexia laws because most states do not report number of students identified as dyslexic but rather those students identified with an SLD. The second aim of the study was to characterize the rate of identifying dyslexia in the two states (Texas and Arkansas) that require public schools to report the number of students identified with dyslexia. The third aim was to characterize the identification rate across first to 12th grades. Current SLD rates range from 3.2 to 8.5% in all 50 states. Analysis of SLD prevalence rates did not vary between states with and without dyslexia laws in place. Moreover, there was no change in the identification of SLD once states had implemented these laws. Rates of dyslexia in Arkansas and Texas were less than 5%. Given the persistent levels indicating lack of reading proficiency, our review of data suggests that overall students with dyslexia are being underidentified.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 368
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Specific procedural learning difficulties as a possible explanation of dyslexia
    Krejcova, Lenka
    Stehlik, Ludek
    Bodnarova, Zuzana
    CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 2016, 60 (03): : 225 - 238
  • [32] Evaluating the continuum of phonological dyslexia
    Buchanan, L
    Westbury, C
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, : 141 - 141
  • [33] SPECIFIC READING-DISABILITY (DYSLEXIA) - LESION LOCALIZATION AND DIAGNOSIS BY EEG
    DUFFY, FH
    DENCKLA, MB
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 49 (3-4): : P83 - P83
  • [34] Implicit Learning and Dyslexia
    Folia, Vasiliki
    Udden, Julia
    Forkstam, Christian
    Ingvar, Martin
    Hagoort, Peter
    Petersson, Karl Magnus
    LEARNING, SKILL ACQUISITION, READING, AND DYSLEXIA, 2008, 1145 : 132 - 150
  • [35] Procedural Learning and Dyslexia
    Nicolson, R. I.
    Fawcett, A. J.
    Brookes, R. L.
    Needle, J.
    DYSLEXIA, 2010, 16 (03) : 194 - 212
  • [36] LEARNING, MEMORY AND DYSLEXIA
    DONE, DT
    MILES, TR
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 32 (JAN): : 31 - 31
  • [37] LIVING AND LEARNING WITH DYSLEXIA
    LEVINE, SL
    OSBOURNE, S
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1989, 70 (08) : 594 - 598
  • [38] Dyslexia in different languages and the effect of dyslexia on foreign language learning
    von Suchodoletz, W.
    SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2007, 31 (03): : 126 - 131
  • [39] DYSLEXIA - IMPACT ON THE FAMILY
    ELYACHAR, A
    JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 1995, 10 (01) : S110 - S111
  • [40] Concealing and revealing: the impact of stigma on the management of dyslexia disability in an organizational context
    Aimar, Damien
    RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2021, 76 (04): : 733 - 760