Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation

被引:393
|
作者
Thurfjell H. [1 ]
Ciuti S. [1 ,2 ]
Boyce M.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Alberta, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, T6G 2E9, AB
[2] University of Freiburg, Department of Biometry and Environmental System Analysis, Freiburg
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Broken stick model; Geographic Information System GIS; GPS telemetry; Habitat selection; Individual modelling; Remote sensing; Resource Selection Function RSF; Resource Selection Probability Function RSPF; State-space model; Step Selection Function SSF;
D O I
10.1186/2051-3933-2-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent progress in positioning technology facilitates the collection of massive amounts of sequential spatial data on animals. This has led to new opportunities and challenges when investigating animal movement behaviour and habitat selection. Tools like Step Selection Functions (SSFs) are relatively new powerful models for studying resource selection by animals moving through the landscape. SSFs compare environmental attributes of observed steps (the linear segment between two consecutive observations of position) with alternative random steps taken from the same starting point. SSFs have been used to study habitat selection, human-wildlife interactions, movement corridors, and dispersal behaviours in animals. SSFs also have the potential to depict resource selection at multiple spatial and temporal scales. There are several aspects of SSFs where consensus has not yet been reached such as how to analyse the data, when to consider habitat covariates along linear paths between observations rather than at their endpoints, how many random steps should be considered to measure availability, and how to account for individual variation. In this review we aim to address all these issues, as well as to highlight weak features of this modelling approach that should be developed by further research. Finally, we suggest that SSFs could be integrated with state-space models to classify behavioural states when estimating SSFs. © 2014 Thurfjell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Functions of base selection step in human DNA polymerase α
    Tanaka, Shigeru
    Cao, Ke
    Niimi, Atsuko
    Limsirichaikul, Siripan
    Miao, Huang Qin
    Nakamura, Noriko
    Murate, Takashi
    Hasegawa, Yoshinori
    Takahashi, Takashi
    Suzuki, Motoshi
    DNA REPAIR, 2010, 9 (05) : 534 - 541
  • [32] CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY
    JUKES, TH
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 1972, 60 (01) : 12 - &
  • [33] Ecology and conservation
    Mason, Mervyn
    Ross, Helen
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 30 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [34] Biodiversity Metric Selection and Their Applications for Spatial Conservation Planning
    Carroll, Kathleen A.
    Pidgeon, Anna M.
    Elsen, Paul
    Farwell, Laura
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [35] Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects
    Kingsly C. Beng
    Richard T. Corlett
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2020, 29 : 2089 - 2121
  • [36] Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects
    Beng, Kingsly C.
    Corlett, Richard T.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 29 (07) : 2089 - 2121
  • [37] Step selection functions with non-linear and random effects
    Klappstein, Natasha J.
    Michelot, Theo
    Fieberg, John
    Pedersen, Eric J.
    Flemming, Joanna Mills
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 15 (08): : 1332 - 1346
  • [38] STEP WIDTH SELECTION IN DESCENT METHODS FOR MINIMIZING CONVEX FUNCTIONS
    DIETZE, S
    SCHWETLI.H
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE MATHEMATIK UND MECHANIK, 1971, 51 (06): : 451 - &
  • [39] Comparing estimation of habitat selection between species distribution modelling and step selection functions
    Menezes, Jorge F. S.
    ECOSISTEMAS, 2023, 32 (02):
  • [40] COUGAR: ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
    Hayes, Loren D.
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2010, 85 (03): : 379 - 379