Quality of life in young men after radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
J L Wright
D W Lin
J E Cowan
P R Carroll
M S Litwin
机构
[1] University of Washington School of Medicine,Department of Urology
[2] University of California,Department of Urology
[3] University of California,Departments of Urology and Health Services
来源
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases | 2008年 / 11卷
关键词
quality of life; age; sexual function; urinary function; prostatectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Urinary and sexual function and bother are important outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP). Since urinary and sexual function are age-related, post-operative bother may vary by age. This study explores the disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes in young men compared with older men undergoing RP. Using CaPSURE data, we identified men who underwent RP and completed the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) before and 1-year post-RP. Men were stratified by age (<55 years, 55–64, ⩾65). Multivariate regression models were created: a linear model for predictors of PCI scores and a logistic model for predictors of severe declines in PCI domains. Younger men scored significantly better than older men in urinary function (P=0.04), urinary bother (P=0.02) and sexual function (P<0.0001) 1-year post-RP. Severe declines in urinary bother (odds ratio (OR)=1.54, 1.01–2.35) and sexual function (OR=3.20, 1.97–5.19) were more common in men ⩾65 years. Men with relationships had less urinary bother (P=0.03) and were less likely to experience severe worsening of urinary bother (OR=0.32, 0.17–0.60) while having a greater risk of severe worsening of sexual bother (OR=2.74, 1.28–5.89). The use of sexual aids was associated with worse sexual bother (P<0.0001) and greater risk of severe worsening of sexual bother (OR=2.29, 1.54–3.30). Baseline PCI scores were independent predictors in all models. One year after RP, younger men (age<55) have similar, or better, urinary and sexual function and bother. Baseline scores are strongly associated with post-RP scores and severity of declines. Current relationships and use of sexual aids have significant roles in post-RP bother.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Health related quality of life in Japanese men after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Namiki, S
    Tochigi, T
    Kuwahara, M
    Ioritani, N
    Terai, A
    Numata, I
    Satoh, M
    Saito, S
    Koinuma, N
    Arai, Y
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) : 619 - 627
  • [43] Quality of life following radical prostatectomy
    Kirschner-Hermanns, R
    Jakse, G
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2002, 43 (02) : 141 - 151
  • [44] Quality of life following radical prostatectomy
    Hodzic, J
    Jedrusik, P
    Reckwitz, T
    Golka, K
    Schulze, H
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2003, 34 (05) : 337 - 340
  • [45] Radical prostatectomy: which quality of life?
    Mercuriali, M.
    Lilli, P.
    Saltutti, C.
    Vivacqua, C.
    Zenico, T.
    Bercovich, E.
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2007, 74 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [46] QUALITY-OF-LIFE AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE
    PEDERSEN, KV
    CARLSSON, P
    RAHMQUIST, M
    VARENHORST, E
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1993, 24 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [47] Evaluation of quality of life after radical prostatectomy-experience in Serbia
    Dragicevic, Svetomir M.
    Soldatovic, Ivan A.
    Bojic, Svellana D.
    Krejovic-Maric, Snezana P.
    Hasani, Bajram H.
    MEDICINSKI GLASNIK, 2012, 9 (02) : 388 - 392
  • [48] Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Link, RE
    Su, LM
    Sullivan, W
    Bhayani, SB
    Pavlovich, CP
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (01): : 175 - 179
  • [49] Quality-of-life after penile prosthesis placed at radical prostatectomy
    Schwartz, CE
    Covino, N
    Morgentaler, A
    DeWolf, W
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2000, 15 (05) : 651 - 661
  • [50] EFFECT OF CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT METHODS ON QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Benyo, M.
    Kriston, A.
    Besenyei, R.
    Herman, A.
    Molnar, Cs. A.
    Molnar, Zs.
    Flasko, T.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (06) : 657 - 657