Comparison of calculation methods of ecological evaluation indexes

被引:0
|
作者
Jiaju Cao
Xingping Wen
Dayou Luo
Junlong Xu
机构
[1] Kunming University of Science and Technology,Faculty of Land Resource Engineering
关键词
Improving Remote Sensing Ecological Index (MRSEI); Improved Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy (FAHP); Tasseled Cap Transformation (K-T); Dianchi Lake Reserve;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-022-10123-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The remote sensing evaluation index can quickly monitor and evaluate regional ecological quality. A more convenient method which can also bring accurate results in practical application is still under discussion. Based on Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel-2, taking Dianchi Lake Reserve in Kunming as an example, the changes of ecological environment quality in Dianchi Lake Reserve are obtained by using the improved remote sensing ecological index analysis method (MRSEI), improved fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), and tasseled cap transformation analysis method (K-T). The first is to establish an MRSEI model based on principal component analysis; the second is to determine the weight of each evaluation index and monitor and quantitatively evaluate the ecological environment; and the third is to carry out orthogonal transformation through the information distribution structure of soil, vegetation, and humidity in multi-dimensional spectral space, and study the applicability of K-T to Sentinel-2. The findings show that the results calculated by the three methods are generally consistent, but the FAHP is the most efficient and simple method to calculate the ecological environment quality. The MRSEI avoids the weight setting that varies from person to person. Compared with other algorithms, FAHP is simpler and has fixed coefficients, and the calculation results are relatively stable. Based on the information distribution structure of soil, vegetation, and other information in multi-dimensional spectral space in multispectral remote sensing, K-T can better highlight the characteristics of main features, reduce vegetation, weaken the information on greenness image, and enhance soil information. Taking Landsat 8 as a reference, it is found that K-T is also applicable in Sentinel-2. This paper provides a scientific basis for the construction of ecological civilization city for Dianchi Lake Reserve.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AN ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF LOTIC ENVIRONMENTS .2. COMPARISON TO EXISTING INDEXES
    ROOKE, JB
    MACKIE, GL
    JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 1982, 1 (04) : 433 - 442
  • [22] A Comparison of Various Ecological Indexes for Environmental Assessment of Vulnerable Mountain Ecosystems
    Totubaeva, Nurzat
    Tokpaeva, Zhiide
    Kojobaev, Kanatbek
    Kurmanbekova, Gulbubu
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2020, 29 (04): : 2879 - 2887
  • [23] Comparison of three IAQ calculation methods
    Muller, Chris
    Stanley, W. Brad M.
    BUILDING SIMULATION 2007, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 1369 - 1376
  • [24] COMPARISON OF 2 OTF CALCULATION METHODS
    BRAY, CP
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1970, 60 (05) : 718 - &
  • [25] Comparison of risk calculation methods for a culvert
    Lian, YQ
    Yen, BC
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2003, 129 (02): : 140 - 152
  • [26] Comparison of numerical methods for evidence calculation
    Preuss, R.
    von Toussaint, U.
    BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 954 : 221 - +
  • [27] COMPARISON OF RHEED DYNAMICAL CALCULATION METHODS
    KAWAMURA, T
    ICHIMIYA, A
    MAKSYM, PA
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS PART 1-REGULAR PAPERS SHORT NOTES & REVIEW PAPERS, 1988, 27 (06): : 1098 - 1099
  • [28] Comparison of methods for hemodialysis dose calculation
    Kovacic, V
    Roguljic, L
    Jukic, I
    Kovacic, V
    DIALYSIS & TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 32 (04) : 170 - +
  • [29] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF FORCE CALCULATION
    MULLER, W
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1990, 26 (02) : 1058 - 1061
  • [30] Comparison of methods for calculation of the wave envelope
    Veltcheva, A
    Cavaco, P
    Soares, CG
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2003, 30 (07) : 937 - 948