Overview and introduction to development of non-ergodic earthquake ground-motion models

被引:0
|
作者
Grigorios Lavrentiadis
Norman A. Abrahamson
Kuehn M. Nicolas
Yousef Bozorgnia
Christine A. Goulet
Anže Babič
Jorge Macedo
Matjaž Dolšek
Nicholas Gregor
Albert R. Kottke
Maxime Lacour
Chenying Liu
Xiaofeng Meng
Van-Bang Phung
Chih-Hsuan Sung
Melanie Walling
机构
[1] Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences University of California,Natural Hazards Risk and Resiliency Research Center (NHR3)
[2] University of California,Department of Civil Engineering
[3] Berkeley,Natural Hazards Risk and Resiliency Research Center (NHR3)
[4] Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences University of California,Southern California Earthquake Center
[5] University of Southern California,Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
[6] University of Ljubljana,School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
[7] Georgia Institute of Technology,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
[8] Geosciences Pacific Gas and Electric Co.,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
[9] University of California,Performance
[10] Berkeley,Based Risk Assessment
[11] University of California,undefined
[12] Berkeley,undefined
[13] GeoEngineers,undefined
[14] Inc.,undefined
来源
关键词
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis; Non-ergodic ground-motion model; Gaussian process regression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides an overview and introduction to the development of non-ergodic ground-motion models, GMMs. It is intended for a reader who is familiar with the standard approach for developing ergodic GMMs. It starts with a brief summary of the development of ergodic GMMs and then describes different methods that are used in the development of non-ergodic GMMs with an emphasis on Gaussian process (GP) regression, as that is currently the method preferred by most researchers contributing to this special issue. Non-ergodic modeling requires the definition of locations for the source and site characterizing the systematic source and site effects; the non-ergodic domain is divided into cells for describing the systematic path effects. Modeling the cell-specific anelastic attenuation as a GP, and considerations on constraints for extrapolation of the non-ergodic GMMs are also discussed. An updated unifying notation for non-ergodic GMMs is also presented, which has been adopted by the authors of this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:5121 / 5150
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Recent developments in the treatment of ground-motion variability in earthquake loss models
    Crowley, Helen
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Stafford, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2008, 12 : 71 - 80
  • [23] Systematic Ground Motion Observations in the Canterbury Earthquakes And Region-Specific Non-Ergodic Empirical Ground Motion Modeling
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (03) : 1735 - 1761
  • [24] Comparison of strong ground motion records from Ludian, China, earthquake with ground-motion attenuation models
    Zhang Bin
    Li XiaoJun
    Yu YanXiang
    Li Na
    Zhu Jun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2020, 63 (08): : 2999 - 3014
  • [25] An offshore non-ergodic ground motion model for subduction earthquakes in Japan Trench area
    Hu, Lei
    Li, Yingmin
    Ji, Shuyan
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (01) : 379 - 419
  • [26] EARTHQUAKE VIBRATORY GROUND-MOTION INTENSITY ATTENUATION
    YOUNG, GA
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1980, 21 (02): : 205 - 214
  • [27] An Earthquake Ground-Motion Model for Southwest Iberia
    Taherian, Amir
    Silva, Vitor
    Kalakonas, Petros
    Vicente, Romeu
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 114 (05) : 2613 - 2638
  • [28] Ranking and Selection of Earthquake Ground-Motion Models Using the Stochastic Area Metric
    Sunny, Jaleena
    De Angelis, Marco
    Edwards, Benjamin
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 93 (2A) : 787 - 797
  • [29] Evaluation of Ground-Motion Models for USGS Seismic Hazard Models Using Near-Source Instrumental Ground-Motion Recordings of the Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence
    McNamara, Daniel E.
    Wolin, Emily L. G.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Thompson, Eric M.
    Powers, Peter M.
    Shumway, Alison M.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Wilson, David C.
    Benz, Harley M.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (04) : 1517 - 1529
  • [30] A non-ergodic spectral acceleration ground motion model for California developed with random vibration theory
    Lavrentiadis, Grigorios
    Abrahamson, Norman A.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 21 (11) : 5265 - 5291