Comparison of HbA1c and FPG as a screening tool for diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in Indian population

被引:0
|
作者
Rajesh Rajput
Ompal Saini
Meena Rajput
Vijay Shankar
机构
[1] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Endocrinology and Medicine Unit VI
[2] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Community Medicine
[3] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Biochemistry
[4] PGIMS,Department of Endocrinology and Medicine Unit VI
关键词
HbA1c; FPG; OGTT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests as a mass screening tool for pre-diabetes and diabetes as defined by standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The study was community-based cross-sectional and carried out in urban field practice area of the Department of Community Medicine at Rohtak. A day before the study, subjects were advised to observe overnight fasting (at least 8 h) and were called at the nearest health center in the morning. Initial evaluation included detailed history and clinical examination to exclude any systemic diseases. FPG and 2-h plasma glucose after 75 g OGTT was used to diagnose pre-diabetes and diabetes in 1008 participant. Fasting plasma glucose and 2-h post glucose load were estimated by glucose oxidase method. HbA1c was measured using Cone lab 30i autoanlyser based on latex agglutination inhibition assay (EIA). The American Diabetic Association (ADA) criteria were used to categorize the subjects into pre-diabetes and diabetes (American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care; 33 Suppl 1:S62–9, 2010). Performance of HbA1c and FPG was evaluated against the results of OGTT by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The prevalence of pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed diabetes was found 20.6 and 12.5 %, respectively. For pre-diabetes, the area under the ROC curve was 0.831 for HbA1c and 0.807 for FPG (p value 0.205), whereas for diabetes, these values were 0.957 for HbA1c and 0.942 for FPG (p value 0.11). At the optimal HbA1c cutoff points of 5.4 % for pre-diabetes and of 6.2 % for newly diagnosed diabetes, sensitivities and specificities were 79.02, 79.31 and 94.24, 90.52 %, respectively. Similarly, FPG optimal cutoff points of ≥97 mg/dl for pre-diabetes and ≥119 mg/dl for diabetes were found to have maximum sensitivities (specificities) of 93.13 (63.32) and 93.53 (89.64), respectively. It is observed that at optimal cutoff of FPG ≥97 mg/dl and HbA1c ≥5.4 % for pre-diabetes and ≥119 mg/dl and 6.2 % for newly diagnosed diabetes, more true-positive cases are identified as compared to currently recommended ADA criteria when both were compared with results of 75 g OGTT. As a screening tool for newly diagnosed pre-diabetes and diabetes, the HbA1c measurement did not perform inferior than FPG. In this study population, FPG and HbA1c values lower than the currently recommended values of ADA were found to be better predictor of pre-diabetes and diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 564
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] HBA1C FOR DIABETES MELLITUS DIAGNOSIS
    Dzebisashvili, T.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2011, 65 : A330 - A331
  • [42] The Use of HbA1c for the Diagnosis of Diabetes
    Enzo Bonora
    Current Diabetes Reports, 2011, 11 : 470 - 471
  • [43] The optimal cut-points of HbA1c for detecting newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes in the Chinese population living in Sichuan
    Hu, Yu
    Zhang, Mei
    She, Yi
    Gao, Jie
    Yuan, Gao-pin
    Xiong, Zhong-yun
    An, Zhen-mei
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 49 (12) : 2117 - 2118
  • [44] Performance of HbA1c for detecting newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes in Chinese communities living in Beijing
    Zhou, X. H.
    Ji, L. N.
    Luo, Y. Y.
    Zhang, X. Y.
    Han, X. Y.
    Qiao, Q.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (12) : 1262 - 1268
  • [45] The clinical value of HbA1c in combination with FPG in the early screening of the elderly with type 2 diabetes
    Liu, Lihua
    Chen, Wenqing
    Dong, Minghua
    Jiang, Lixia
    Qiu, Wei
    Li, Jian
    Luo, Xiaoting
    Huang, Zhengchun
    Wu, Qin
    Wu, Qinfeng
    Chen, Shuiqin
    Lu Ou-Yang
    Li, Shumei
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEDICINE SCIENCES AND BIOENGINEERING (ICMSB2016), 2017, 8
  • [46] HbA1c: An effective screening tool for cystic fibrosis related diabetes?
    Schnyder, Marie-Angela
    Benden, Christian
    Schmid, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2016, 15 (02) : 261 - 262
  • [47] HbA1c as a screening tool for cystic fibrosis related diabetes Response
    Burgess, Juliana C.
    Bridges, Nicola
    Winston, Banya
    Gyi, Khin M.
    Hodson, Margaret E.
    Bilton, Diana
    Simmonds, Nicholas J.
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2016, 15 (02) : 265 - 266
  • [48] Using HbA1c as a screening tool for Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes
    Widger, John
    Hameed, Shihab
    Ooi, Chee Y.
    Verge, Charles
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2016, 15 (02) : 263 - 264
  • [49] Comparison of the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and HbA1c as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Gestational Diabetes
    Withanawasam, N.
    Tara, S.
    Mccallum, G.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 : 87 - 87
  • [50] Tools for Practice Screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes with HbA1c
    Mannarino, Marco
    Tonelli, Marcello
    Allan, G. Michael
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2013, 59 (01) : 42 - 42