Acceptance and Certainty, Doxastic Modals, and Indicative Conditionals

被引:0
|
作者
Kurt Norlin
机构
[1] Bittner Development Group,
来源
关键词
Indicative conditionals; Doxastic modals; Acceptance logic; Ramsey test; Modus ponens; Import-export;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
I give a semantics for a logic with two pairs of doxastic modals and an indicative conditional connective that all nest without restriction. Sentences are evaluated as accepted, rejected, or neither. Certainty is the necessity-like modality of acceptance. Inferences may proceed from premises that are certain, or merely accepted, or a mix of both. This semantic setup yields some striking results. Notably, the existence of inferences that preserve certainty but not acceptance very directly implies both failure of modus ponens for the indicative conditional in the logic of acceptance and failure of the deduction theorem for the material conditional in the logic of certainty. The latter failure dissolves, in the logic of certainty, the much - discussed tension between modus ponens and the law of import-export.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 971
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Indicative conditionals without iterative epistemology
    Holguin, Ben
    NOUS, 2021, 55 (03): : 560 - 580
  • [42] Do Indicative Conditionals Express Propositions?
    Rothschild, Daniel
    NOUS, 2013, 47 (01): : 49 - 68
  • [43] Defending truth values for indicative conditionals
    Kelly Weirich
    Philosophical Studies, 2020, 177 : 1635 - 1657
  • [44] Learning from Simple Indicative Conditionals
    Leendert M. Huisman
    Erkenntnis, 2017, 82 : 583 - 601
  • [45] Indicative Conditionals and Dynamic Epistemic Logic
    Holliday, Wesley H.
    Icard, Thomas F., III
    ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2017, (251): : 337 - 351
  • [46] Acceptance and Managerial Doxastic Agency
    Buckareff, Andrei A.
    GRAZER PHILOSOPHISCHE STUDIEN-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 99 (03): : 359 - 378
  • [47] MOVEMENT OF THE INDICATIVE AS CONSTITUTING CERTAINTY
    TRAN, DT
    PENSEE, 1981, (220): : 17 - 31
  • [48] INDICATIVE CONDITIONALS, RESTRICTED QUANTIFICATION, AND NAIVE TRUTH
    Field, Hartry
    REVIEW OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 2016, 9 (01): : 181 - 208
  • [49] When will is not the same as should: The role of modals in reasoning with legal conditionals
    Gazzo Castaneda, Lupita Estefania
    Knauff, Markus
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 69 (08): : 1480 - 1497
  • [50] Why Hypothetical Syllogism is Invalid for Indicative Conditionals
    Mizrahi, Moti
    THOUGHT-A JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 2 (01): : 40 - 43