Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses

被引:0
|
作者
Kevin Dykstra
Nitin Mehrotra
Christoffer Wenzel Tornøe
Helen Kastrissios
Bela Patel
Nidal Al-Huniti
Pravin Jadhav
Yaning Wang
Wonkyung Byon
机构
[1] qPharmetra LLC,Division of Pharmacometrics
[2] US Food and Drug Administration,Clinical Reporting
[3] Novo Nordisk,Pharsight Consulting Services
[4] Certara,Clinical Pharmacology, Quantitative Sciences
[5] GlaxoSmithKline,Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology
[6] AstraZeneca,Quantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics
[7] Merck and Co.,Global Innovative Pharma Business Clinical Pharmacology
[8] Pfizer Inc.,undefined
关键词
Pharmacometrics; Population pharmacokinetics; PK reporting; Regulatory submission; Best practices;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this work was to develop a consolidated set of guiding principles for reporting of population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses based on input from a survey of practitioners as well as discussions between industry, consulting and regulatory scientists. The survey found that identification of population covariate effects on drug exposure and support for dose selection (where population PK frequently serves as preparatory analysis to exposure–response modeling) are the main areas of influence for population PK analysis. The proposed guidelines consider two main purposes of population PK reports (1) to present key analysis findings and their impact on drug development decisions, and (2) as documentation of the analysis methods for the dual purpose of enabling review of the analysis and facilitating future use of the models. This work also identified two main audiences for the reports: (1) a technically competent group responsible for in-depth review of the data, methodology, and results, and (2) a scientifically literate, but not technically adept group, whose main interest is in the implications of the analysis for the broader drug development program. We recommend a generalized question-based approach with six questions that need to be addressed throughout the report. We recommend eight sections (Synopsis, Introduction, Data, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Appendix) with suggestions for the target audience and level of detail for each section. A section providing general expectations regarding population PK reporting from a regulatory perspective is also included. We consider this an important step towards industrialization of the field of pharmacometrics such that non-technical audience also understands the role of pharmacometrics analyses in decision making. Population PK reports were chosen as representative reports to derive these recommendations; however, the guiding principles presented here are applicable for all pharmacometric reports including PKPD and simulation reports.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 314
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Guidelines for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
    Rubio-Aparicio, Maria
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose Antonio
    ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2018, 34 (02): : 412 - 420
  • [22] Individualized Absorption Models in Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses
    Jaber, Mutaz M.
    Al-Kofahi, Mahmoud
    Sarafoglou, Kyriakie
    Brundage, Richard C.
    CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 9 (06): : 307 - 309
  • [23] Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Lithium: A Systematic Review
    Methaneethorn, Janthima
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS, 2018, 43 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [24] Correction: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Linezolid
    Enrique Bandín-Vilar
    Laura García-Quintanilla
    Ana Castro-Balado
    Irene Zarra-Ferro
    Miguel González-Barcia
    Manuel Campos-Toimil
    Víctor Mangas-Sanjuan
    Cristina Mondelo-García
    Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2023, 62 : 1331 - 1331
  • [25] Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Lithium: A Systematic Review
    Janthima Methaneethorn
    European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 2018, 43 : 25 - 34
  • [26] A systematic review of population pharmacokinetic analyses of digoxin in the paediatric population
    Jalil, Mariam H. Abdel
    Abdullah, Noura
    Alsous, Mervat M.
    Saleh, Mohammad
    Abu-Hammour, Khawla
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 86 (07) : 1267 - 1280
  • [27] Sources of lamotrigine pharmacokinetic variability: A systematic review of population pharmacokinetic analyses
    Methaneethorn, Janthima
    Leelakanok, Nattawut
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2020, 82 : 133 - 147
  • [28] Reporting of the Trimmed Population in Propensity Score Analyses
    Ziemiecki, Ryan
    Odom, Dawn
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Thomas, Steven M.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 147 - 148
  • [29] PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews
    Arya, Shipra
    Kaji, Amy H.
    Boermeester, Marja A.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (08) : 789 - 790
  • [30] MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies
    Brooke, Benjamin S.
    Schwartz, Todd A.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (08) : 787 - 788