Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses

被引:0
|
作者
Kevin Dykstra
Nitin Mehrotra
Christoffer Wenzel Tornøe
Helen Kastrissios
Bela Patel
Nidal Al-Huniti
Pravin Jadhav
Yaning Wang
Wonkyung Byon
机构
[1] qPharmetra LLC,Division of Pharmacometrics
[2] US Food and Drug Administration,Clinical Reporting
[3] Novo Nordisk,Pharsight Consulting Services
[4] Certara,Clinical Pharmacology, Quantitative Sciences
[5] GlaxoSmithKline,Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology
[6] AstraZeneca,Quantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics
[7] Merck and Co.,Global Innovative Pharma Business Clinical Pharmacology
[8] Pfizer Inc.,undefined
关键词
Pharmacometrics; Population pharmacokinetics; PK reporting; Regulatory submission; Best practices;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this work was to develop a consolidated set of guiding principles for reporting of population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses based on input from a survey of practitioners as well as discussions between industry, consulting and regulatory scientists. The survey found that identification of population covariate effects on drug exposure and support for dose selection (where population PK frequently serves as preparatory analysis to exposure–response modeling) are the main areas of influence for population PK analysis. The proposed guidelines consider two main purposes of population PK reports (1) to present key analysis findings and their impact on drug development decisions, and (2) as documentation of the analysis methods for the dual purpose of enabling review of the analysis and facilitating future use of the models. This work also identified two main audiences for the reports: (1) a technically competent group responsible for in-depth review of the data, methodology, and results, and (2) a scientifically literate, but not technically adept group, whose main interest is in the implications of the analysis for the broader drug development program. We recommend a generalized question-based approach with six questions that need to be addressed throughout the report. We recommend eight sections (Synopsis, Introduction, Data, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Appendix) with suggestions for the target audience and level of detail for each section. A section providing general expectations regarding population PK reporting from a regulatory perspective is also included. We consider this an important step towards industrialization of the field of pharmacometrics such that non-technical audience also understands the role of pharmacometrics analyses in decision making. Population PK reports were chosen as representative reports to derive these recommendations; however, the guiding principles presented here are applicable for all pharmacometric reports including PKPD and simulation reports.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 314
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses
    Dykstra, Kevin
    Mehrotra, Nitin
    Tornoe, Christoffer Wenzel
    Kastrissios, Helen
    Patel, Bela
    Al-Huniti, Nidal
    Jadhav, Pravin
    Wang, Yaning
    Byon, Wonkyung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 55 (08): : 875 - 887
  • [2] Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses
    Dykstra, Kevin
    Mehrotra, Nitin
    Tornoe, Christoffer Wenzel
    Kastrissios, Helen
    Patel, Bela
    Al-Huniti, Nidal
    Jadhav, Pravin
    Wang, Yaning
    Byon, Wonkyung
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2015, 42 (03) : 301 - 314
  • [3] A guide for reporting the results of population pharmacokinetic analyses: A Swedish perspective
    Wade, JR
    Edholm, M
    Salmonson, T
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2005, 7 (02): : E456 - E460
  • [4] A guide for reporting the results of population pharmacokinetic analyses: A Swedish perspective
    Janet R. Wade
    Monica Edholm
    Tomas Salmonson
    The AAPS Journal, 7
  • [5] Guidelines for the Quality Control of Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Analyses: an Industry Perspective
    P. L. Bonate
    A. Strougo
    A. Desai
    M. Roy
    A. Yassen
    J. S. van der Walt
    A. Kaibara
    S. Tannenbaum
    The AAPS Journal, 2012, 14 : 749 - 758
  • [6] Guidelines for the Quality Control of Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analyses: an Industry Perspective
    Bonate, P. L.
    Strougo, A.
    Desai, A.
    Roy, M.
    Yassen, A.
    van der Walt, J. S.
    Kaibara, A.
    Tannenbaum, S.
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (04): : 749 - 758
  • [7] Animal Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Studies (APPS) Reporting Guidelines
    Jasbir Singh
    Fawzy Elbarbry
    Ke Lan
    Tomasz Grabowski
    European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 2018, 43 : 483 - 494
  • [8] Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studies: The ClinPK Statement
    Salmaan Kanji
    Meghan Hayes
    Adam Ling
    Larissa Shamseer
    Clarence Chant
    David J. Edwards
    Scott Edwards
    Mary H. H. Ensom
    David R. Foster
    Brian Hardy
    Tyree H. Kiser
    Charles la Porte
    Jason A. Roberts
    Rob Shulman
    Scott Walker
    Sheryl Zelenitsky
    David Moher
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2015, 54 : 783 - 795
  • [9] Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studies: The ClinPK Statement
    Kanji, Salmaan
    Hayes, Meghan
    Ling, Adam
    Shamseer, Larissa
    Chant, Clarence
    Edwards, David J.
    Edwards, Scott
    Ensom, Mary H. H.
    Foster, David R.
    Hardy, Brian
    Kiser, Tyree H.
    la Porte, Charles
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Shulman, Rob
    Walker, Scott
    Zelenitsky, Sheryl
    Moher, David
    CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2015, 54 (07) : 783 - 795
  • [10] Animal Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Studies (APPS) Reporting Guidelines
    Singh, Jasbir
    Elbarbry, Fawzy
    Lan, Ke
    Grabowski, Tomasz
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS, 2018, 43 (05) : 483 - 494