Single-trial dynamics of motor cortex and their applications to brain-machine interfaces

被引:0
|
作者
Jonathan C. Kao
Paul Nuyujukian
Stephen I. Ryu
Mark M. Churchland
John P. Cunningham
Krishna V. Shenoy
机构
[1] Stanford University,Electrical Engineering Department
[2] Stanford University,Bioengineering Department
[3] School of Medicine,Department of Neuroscience
[4] Stanford University,Department of Statistics
[5] Palo Alto Medical Foundation,Neurobiology Department
[6] Columbia University,undefined
[7] Columbia University,undefined
[8] Neurosciences Program,undefined
[9] Stanford University,undefined
[10] Stanford University,undefined
[11] Bio-X Program,undefined
[12] Stanford University,undefined
[13] Stanford Neurosciences Institute,undefined
[14] Stanford University,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Increasing evidence suggests that neural population responses have their own internal drive, or dynamics, that describe how the neural population evolves through time. An important prediction of neural dynamical models is that previously observed neural activity is informative of noisy yet-to-be-observed activity on single-trials, and may thus have a denoising effect. To investigate this prediction, we built and characterized dynamical models of single-trial motor cortical activity. We find these models capture salient dynamical features of the neural population and are informative of future neural activity on single trials. To assess how neural dynamics may beneficially denoise single-trial neural activity, we incorporate neural dynamics into a brain–machine interface (BMI). In online experiments, we find that a neural dynamical BMI achieves substantially higher performance than its non-dynamical counterpart. These results provide evidence that neural dynamics beneficially inform the temporal evolution of neural activity on single trials and may directly impact the performance of BMIs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning decoding of single neurons in the thalamus for speech brain-machine interfaces
    Tankus, Ariel
    Rosenberg, Noam
    Ben-Hamo, Oz
    Stern, Einat
    Strauss, Ido
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 21 (03)
  • [22] Brain-machine and brain-computer interfaces
    Friehs, GM
    Zerris, VA
    Ojakangas, CL
    Fellows, MR
    Donoghue, JP
    STROKE, 2004, 35 (11) : 2702 - 2705
  • [23] Brain-Machine Interfaces Researches in Rats
    Zheng, Xiaoxiang
    Zhang, Shaomin
    Liu, Jun
    Dai, Jianhua
    Yu, Yi
    ASCC: 2009 7TH ASIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 982 - 987
  • [24] Recent advances in brain-machine interfaces
    Isa, Tadashi
    Fetz, Eberhard E.
    Mueller, Klaus-Robert
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2009, 22 (09) : 1201 - 1202
  • [25] Intention estimation in brain-machine interfaces
    Fan, Joline M.
    Nuyujukian, Paul
    Kao, Jonathan C.
    Chestek, Cynthia A.
    Ryu, Stephen I.
    Shenoy, Krishna V.
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 11 (01)
  • [26] Brain-Machine Interfaces to Assist the Blind
    Ptito, Maurice
    Bleau, Maxime
    Djerourou, Ismael
    Pare, Samuel
    Schneider, Fabien C.
    Chebat, Daniel-Robert
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [27] Exploring Cognition with Brain-Machine Interfaces
    Andersen, Richard A.
    Aflalo, Tyson
    Bashford, Luke
    Bjanes, David
    Kellis, Spencer
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 73 : 131 - 158
  • [28] Brain-machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke
    Soekadar, Surjo R.
    Birbaumer, Niels
    Slutzky, Marc W.
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE, 2015, 83 : 172 - 179
  • [29] BRAIN-MACHINE INTERFACES Back in control
    Sebastian, Catherine
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 9 (12) : 887 - 887
  • [30] Reality check for brain-machine interfaces
    Losanno, E.
    Milekovic, T.
    Shu, T.
    Moses, D. A.
    Yvert, B.
    Fourneret, E.
    NATURE REVIEWS BIOENGINEERING, 2024, 2 (08): : 627 - 627