The influence of stress on attentional bias to threat: An angry face and a noisy crowd

被引:0
|
作者
Heidi A. Rued
Clayton J. Hilmert
Anna M. Strahm
Laura E. Thomas
机构
[1] North Dakota State University,Department of Psychology—2765
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2019年 / 26卷
关键词
Visual search; Stress; Reaction time analysis; Attentional capture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During stress, attentional capture by threatening stimuli may be particularly adaptive. Individuals are more efficient at identifying threatening faces in a crowd than identifying nonthreatening faces (e.g., Öhman et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3): 466–478, 2001a, Öhman et al., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3): 381–396, 2001b). However, under conditions of stress, when attention to threat may be most critical, cognitive processes are generally disrupted. The present study explored the attentional advantage of threatening stimuli under stressful conditions. We exposed participants to either high or low stress conditions during a visual search task displaying threatening and nonthreatening facial targets among distractors. Participants’ accuracy, reaction times, and self-reported stress were measured. Stress introduced a speed–accuracy trade-off: participants in the high-stress condition were faster, but less accurate, than participants in the low-stress condition. Although both groups of participants showed relative performance advantages in detecting threatening compared with nonthreatening stimuli, this advantage was markedly larger for participants in the high-stress condition. This suggests that the established stress-mediated increase in the activity of the ventral neural network responsible for the reorienting of attention may have enhanced the ability to detect threatening stimuli or buffered the disruptive effects of stress on this process. Our findings highlight the potentially adaptive nature of stress disruption on attentional processes and align research on the anger superiority effect and automated attentional processes under stress.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 950
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Men Are Better than Women at Ferreting Out Angry Face in a Crowd
    Nicholas Bakalar
    苏庆伟
    当代外语研究, 2006, (09) : 7 - 8
  • [32] The development of an attentional bias for angry faces following Pavlovian fear conditioning
    Pischek-Simpson, Leah K.
    Boschen, Mark J.
    Neumann, David L.
    Waters, Allison M.
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2009, 47 (04) : 322 - 330
  • [33] Dynamics of Attentional Bias to Threat in Anxious Adults: Bias towards and/or Away?
    Zvielli, Ariel
    Bernstein, Amit
    Koster, Ernst H. W.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [34] Limited transfer of threat bias following attentional retraining
    Van Bockstaele, Bram
    Koster, Ernst H. W.
    Verschuere, Bruno
    Crombez, Geert
    De Houwer, Jan
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 43 (02) : 794 - 800
  • [35] Observational learning of threat-related attentional bias
    Gregoire, Laurent
    Dubravac, Mirela
    Moore, Kirsten
    Kim, Namgyun
    Anderson, Brian A.
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2024, 38 (05) : 789 - 800
  • [36] The face in the crowd revisited:: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli
    Öhman, A
    Lundqvist, D
    Esteves, F
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (03) : 381 - 396
  • [37] The Computational Basis of Threat-Related Attentional Bias
    Wise, Toby
    Michely, Jochen
    Dayan, Peter
    Dolan, Ray
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 83 (09) : S240 - S240
  • [38] The time course of attentional bias to cues of threat and safety
    Schmidt, Lisette J.
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Theeuwes, Jan
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2017, 31 (05) : 845 - 857
  • [39] Automaticity of Attentional Bias to Threat in High and Low Worriers
    Goodwin, Huw
    Eagleson, Claire
    Mathews, Andrew
    Yiend, Jenny
    Hirsch, Colette
    COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2017, 41 (03) : 479 - 488
  • [40] Automaticity of Attentional Bias to Threat in High and Low Worriers
    Huw Goodwin
    Claire Eagleson
    Andrew Mathews
    Jenny Yiend
    Colette Hirsch
    Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2017, 41 : 479 - 488