The usefulness of the Sequence Alignment Methods in validating rule-based activity-based forecasting models

被引:0
|
作者
George Sammour
Tom Bellemans
Koen Vanhoof
Davy Janssens
Bruno Kochan
Geert Wets
机构
[1] Hasselt University,Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Faculty of Applied Economics
来源
Transportation | 2012年 / 39卷
关键词
Activity-based models validation; Sequence Alignment Methods; Classification methods; Process models;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research paper aims at achieving a better understanding of rule-based activity-based models, by proposing a new level of validation at the process model level in the A Learning-based Transportation Oriented Simulation System (ALBATROSS) model. To that effect, the work activity process model, which includes six decision steps, has been investigated. Each decision step is evaluated during the prediction of the individuals’ schedules. There are specific decision steps that affect the execution pattern of the work activity process model. So, the comportment of execution in the process model contains activation dependency. This branches the execution and evaluation of each agent under examination. Sequence Alignment Methods (SAM) can be used to evaluate how similar/dissimilar the predicted and observed decision sequences are on an agent level. The original Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector decision trees at each decision step utilized in ALBATROSS are compared with other well known induction methods chosen to appraise the purpose of the analyses. The models are validated at four levels: the classifier or decision step level whereby confusion matrix statistics are used; The work activity trips Origin–Destination matrix level; the time of day work activity start time level, using a correlation coefficient; and the process model level, using SAM. The results of validation on the proposed process model level show conformity to all validation levels. In addition, the results provide additional information in better understanding the process model’s behavior. Hence, introducing a new level of validation incur new knowledge and assess the predictive performance of rule-based activity-based models. And assist in identifying critical decision steps in the work activity process model.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 789
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] From Fuzzy Rule-Based Models to Granular Models
    Cui, Ye
    Hanyu, E.
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Li, Zhiwu
    Wang, Xianmin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2025, 33 (02) : 644 - 656
  • [42] Rule-Based Methods for ECG Quality Control
    Moody, Benjamin E.
    2011 COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 38 : 361 - 363
  • [43] Guidelines for visualizing and annotating rule-based models
    Chylek, Lily A.
    Hu, Bin
    Blinov, Michael L.
    Emonet, Thierry
    Faeder, James R.
    Goldstein, Byron
    Gutenkunst, Ryan N.
    Haugh, Jason M.
    Lipniacki, Tomasz
    Posner, Richard G.
    Yang, Jin
    Hlavacek, William S.
    MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, 2011, 7 (10) : 2779 - 2795
  • [44] Designing Distributed Fuzzy Rule-Based Models
    Cui, Ye
    E, Hanyu
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Li, Zhiwu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 29 (07) : 2047 - 2053
  • [45] Hybrid identification of fuzzy rule-based models
    Oh, SK
    Pedrycz, W
    Park, YJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (01) : 77 - 103
  • [46] Semantics of Visual Models in a Rule-based Setting
    Kreowski, Hans-Joerg
    Hoelscher, Karsten
    Knirsch, Peter
    ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2006, 148 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [47] A Trace Query Language for Rule-Based Models
    Laurent, Jonathan
    Medina-Abarca, Hector F.
    Boutillier, Pierre
    Yang, Jean
    Fontana, Walter
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SYSTEMS BIOLOGY (CMSB 2018), 2018, 11095 : 220 - 237
  • [48] Random ensemble of fuzzy rule-based models
    Hu, Xingchen
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Wang, Xianmin
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2019, 181
  • [49] Linearity testing for fuzzy rule-based models
    Luis Aznarte, Jose
    Medeiros, Marcelo C.
    Benitez, Jose M.
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 161 (13) : 1836 - 1851
  • [50] On cognitive preferences and the plausibility of rule-based models
    Fuernkranz, Johannes
    Kliegr, Tomas
    Paulheim, Heiko
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2020, 109 (04) : 853 - 898