Artificial intelligence;
Trust in AI;
Discretion;
Normative expectations;
Future of medicine;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
学科分类号:
摘要:
This paper sets out an account of trust in AI as a relationship between clinicians, AI applications, and AI practitioners in which AI is given discretionary authority over medical questions by clinicians. Compared to other accounts in recent literature, this account more adequately explains the normative commitments created by practitioners when inviting clinicians’ trust in AI. To avoid committing to an account of trust in AI applications themselves, I sketch a reductive view on which discretionary authority is exercised by AI practitioners through the vehicle of an AI application. I conclude with four critical questions based on the discretionary account to determine if trust in particular AI applications is sound, and a brief discussion of the possibility that the main roles of the physician could be replaced by AI.
机构:
NYU, Stern Sch Business, Mkt, New York, NY USABoston Univ, Questrom Sch Business, Mkt, Boston, MA 02215 USA
Bonezzi, Andrea
Morewedge, Carey K.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Boston Univ, Questrom Sch Business, Mkt, Boston, MA 02215 USA
Boston Univ, Questrom Sch Business, Boston, MA 02215 USABoston Univ, Questrom Sch Business, Mkt, Boston, MA 02215 USA
机构:
Rice Univ, Med Humanities Program, 6100 Main St,MS-30, Houston, TX 77005 USA
Rice Univ, Dept English, 6100 Main St,MS-30, Houston, TX 77005 USARice Univ, Med Humanities Program, 6100 Main St,MS-30, Houston, TX 77005 USA
机构:
Univ Paris 5 Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Pl Odeon, F-75005 Paris, France
Hop Cochin, AP HP, Dept Radiol, F-75014 Paris, FranceUniv Paris 5 Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Pl Odeon, F-75005 Paris, France